Why so much interest? Masur believes that the Civil War, perhaps more than any other event in American history, "invite[s] . . . speculation about whether it could have been avoided, or turned out differently." It raises "nettlesome" questions about causation and contingency.
Americans also continue to view the Civil War as transformational. And they are right to do so, Masur suggests. He ends his essay on this note:
In 1873, Mark Twain and Charles Dudley Warner observed that the Civil War had "uprooted institutions that were centuries old, changed the politics of a people, transformed the social life of half the country, and wrought so profoundly upon the entire national character that the influence cannot be measured short of two or three generations." The sesquicentennial will provide a continuing opportunity to try to fathom those changes and to understand how the nation is still challenged by forces unleashed in those uncompromising years.The piece also includes a useful list of other recent and forthcoming sesquicentennial studies: Donald Stoker, The Grand Design: Strategy and the U.S. Civil War (Oxford University Press); George C. Rable, God's Almost Chosen Peoples: A Religious History of the American Civil War (University of North Carolina Press, forthcoming); David Goldfield, America Aflame: How the Civil War Created a Nation (Bloomsbury Press, forthcoming); and Gary W. Gallagher, The Union War (Harvard University Press, forthcoming).
Hat tip: bookforum