More information is available here.
Distinguishing the Righteous from the Roguish examines the court’s decisions in this era and shows how Arkansas, as a rural slave-holding state, did not follow the transformational patterns typical of some other states during the nineteenth century. Rather than using the law to promote broad economic growth and encourage social change, the Arkansas court attempted to accommodate the interests of the elite class by preserving the institution of slavery. The ideology of paternalism is reflected in the decisions of the court, and Looney shows how social and political stability—an emphasis on preserving the status quo of the so-called righteous—came at the expense of broader economic development.
Thursday, September 8, 2016
Looney on the Arkansas Supreme Court, 1836-74
New from the University of Arkansas Press: Distinguishing the Righteous from the Roguish: The Arkansas Supreme Court, 1836-1874 (August 2016), by J. W. Looney (University of Arkansas School of Law). A description from the Press: