Whittington on the Bounded Independence of American Courts

Keith E. Whittington, Princeton University, has posted The Bounded Independence of American Courts, which will appear in the New York University Law Review Online (2017):

President Donald Trump's rhetoric and behavior have given rise to numerous doubts about his willingness to adhere to basic norms of the American constitutional and political system. Some have even worried that his evident disrespect for the American judiciary might lead him to defy an adverse judicial ruling and reject the significance of constitutional and legal checks on the presidency. Such worries reflect the real vulnerability of courts to political backlash and the political bounds of effective judicial independence. Even so, there is good reason to think that Trump's bark is worse than his bite when it comes to the courts. While Trump himself might not be very invested in the integrity and authority of the federal courts, political elites in both political parties are heavily invested in the preservation of a judiciary capable of articulating and enforcing limits on government power. The president would quickly find himself politically isolated were he to launch a serious assault on the courts.

H/t: Legal Theory Blog