[We have the following CFP. DRE.]
"The refugee-migrant distinction: toward a global history,” October 15-16, 2026, Darwin College, Cambridge, UK. Organizers: Bastiaan Bouwman (Utrecht University, the Netherlands), Fabrice Langrognet (CNRS, France), Jeremy Adelman (University of Cambridge). Funded by Princeton Institute for International and Regional Studies (Fung Global Network Fund) and Gates Cambridge Trust
The distinction between refugees and migrants is central to current law, policy, and public debate around asylum and migration. While the distinction between refugees and migrants is far from the only factor in shaping migration policies (Thiollet et al., 2024), states' prerogative of granting refugee status serves as an important albeit unreliable carve-out from a generally restrictive mobility regime. Opponents and proponents of permissive immigration rules each tend to emphasize the binary nature of the distinction - and its close corollary, "forced" versus "voluntary" migration - to their own ends. Restrictionists argue that most people crossing borders in search of asylum, especially in irregular ways, are not "deserving" refugees, but are actually unwelcome "economic migrants." Conversely, most refugee advocates, and especially the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) (Carling, 2023), insist that it is essential to defend the legally protected status and essential nature of "refugees" as distinct from "migrants." Scholars have shown, however, that the empirical difference between refugees and migrants is often tenuous (Lucassen, Lucassen and Manning, 2010), even in good-faith attempts to adjudicate it, whereas the fraught politics of migration ensures that attempts to police the distinction in practice are often deeply arbitrary and capricious. Yet insistence on this binary allows liberal states to legitimize their exclusionary bordering practices, relegating "mere" migrants to a realm of virtually unrestrained state discretion (Long, 2013; Hamlin, 2021). Meanwhile, sweeping policies ostensibly aimed at deterring only migrants also impede access to asylum, hurting "genuine" refugees as well (Costello, 2018; FitzGerald, 2019). Hence, some leading refugee advocates have wondered whether refugee scholars should "hold the line" separating refugees from (other) migrants (Aleinikoff, 2021).
A view of refugees and migrants as ontologically distinct has permeated much scholarship, including recent work on "refugee history," which has sought to redress forced migrants' previous erasure from much of the historical record (Langrognet, 2023; Marfleet, 2025). Yet historians have, like social scientists, paid increasing attention to the construction and contestation of the "refugee" label, denaturalizing it by analyzing its contingent, situated manifestations over time. Most scholars now understand that "in writing the history of refugees, they need to be alive to the process of constructing refugees and not simply to take 'refugee' as a pre-existing category" (Stone, 2018: 103). By attending to this process, historians have begun to show how the uneven implementation of political and legal categories - (im)migrant, refugee, displaced person, etc. - has been produced by and influenced a range of social and political factors, and the ability of people to challenge or evade these (Reinisch and Frank, 2014; Gabaccia, 2022; Huhn and Rass, 2025; Struillou, Zehni and Manneh, 2025; Gatrell, 2025). In this manner, refugee history has made visible the wider ideological tensions at stake, including nationalism versus cosmopolitanism, mobility versus immobility, and pluralism versus essentialism.
The aim of this conference is to more fully elucidate the relational nature of the distinction between refugees and migrants, its function in the wider field of migration, and its genealogy. Much of the scholarship on the refugee-migrant distinction has been carried out by social scientists and legal scholars (Zetter, 1991; Crawley and Skleparis, 2018; Erdal and Oeppen, 2018; Atak and Crépeau, 2021; Abdelaaty and Hamlin, 2022; Bialas et al., 2025), whose work is focused on the present. While engaging in conversation with the narratives and arguments they advance, the conference will take a more historical perspective, which will also better inform contemporary debate. While historians have in recent years gone beyond methodological nationalism to trace the evolution of the "international refugee regime" and other transnational dimensions of twentieth-century forced displacement (e.g. Bresselau von Bressensdorf, 2019; Jansen and Lässig, 2020; Taylor et al., 2021; Schönhagen, 2023; Bouwman, 2026), there is no agreement on how, why, and where the refugee-migrant distinction surfaced, circulated, and functioned, be it in the interwar era, the postwar and Cold War periods, or the "restrictive turn" of the 1980s. Whereas the historiographies of forced displacement and migration have too often remained separate, answering these questions promises to productively chart overlaps between these fields (Gatrell, 2019).
The conference also aims to expand our understanding of the refugee-migrant distinction's role beyond the West, given the Eurocentric origins of the 1951 Refugee Convention and the field of refugee law (Madokoro, 2016; Ballinger, 2025). Scholarship on flight and migration still centers heavily on Western countries that receive people on the move, especially their policies of admission or contributions to the international refugee regime's stated goal of achieving "durable solutions." This remains an important topic, especially since in the US and elsewhere, we are arguably witnessing the "end of asylum", with indiscriminate anti-immigration policies casting the distinction between refugees and migrants in doubt (Ngai, 2025). But more work is needed on other world regions, which always knew migration and forced displacement but only gradually, partly, and sometimes not at all became subject to the institutions and categories that rose in the West - and even when they were, not without contestation. Non-Western states and regions also generated their own conceptions of the relationship between refugees and migrants, moreover, calling the historiographical centrality of Western-centric institutions into question (Abdelaaty, 2021; Kapoor, 2022; Moretti, 2022; Reed and Schenck, 2023; Hamed-Troyansky, 2024; Moon, 2025).
The conference will bring together both established and early-career scholars. While historical in focus, interdisciplinary approaches and reflection are welcomed. A form of joint publication following the conference is envisioned, such as a special issue in a leading journal.
We welcome proposals on any aspect of the above, including from such standpoints as:
- Agency of refugees and migrants
- Advocacy for migrants' rights
- Labor/economic policy
- Socioeconomic rights, e.g. the right to work
- Differential functioning of the refugee-migrant distinction based on national origin, ethnicity, race, class, gender, sexual orientation, age, or religion
- Collaboration and competition in international governance, e.g. between UNHCR and IOM
- Externalization of border control
- Consequences for the refugee-migrant distinction of the recent erosion of the right of asylum (e.g. in the U.S. since 2020)
- Public attitudes toward refugees and migrants
- Knowledge production about (forced) migration and its governance
Proposals, including an abstract of ca. 300 words and a biographical note of ca. 100 words, should be sent by 16 February 2026 to fgnf.cambridge@gmail.com. Applicants will be notified in March 2026. Note that participants will be asked to submit papers for pre-circulation by the end of September 2026.
Early-career scholars are encouraged to apply. On a case-by-case basis, financial help can be provided to applicants upon request; please include such requests with your proposal, including explanation as to why support is required.
[Bibliography after the the jump.]
Abdelaaty, Lamis, 2021, Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees, New York: Oxford University Press.
Abdelaaty, Lamis, and Rebecca Hamlin, 2022, "Introduction: The politics of the migrant/refugee binary," Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 20, 2: 233-39.
Aleinikoff, T. Alexander, Zamore, Leah, 2019, The Arc of Protection: Reforming the International Refugee Regime, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Aleinikoff, T. Alexander, 2021, "Can Refugee Scholars Hold the Line?" https://publicseminar.org/essays/can-refugee-scholars-hold-the-line/.
Atak, Idil, and François Crépeau, 2021, "Refugees as Migrants," in Cathryn Costello, Michelle Foster, and Jane McAdam., eds., The Oxford Handbook of International Refugee Law, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 134-51.
Ballinger, Pamela, 2025, "Historical foundations and limitations of international refugee law," Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 21, 285-305.
Bialas, Ulrike, et al., 2025, "Contested categories in the context of international migration: Introduction to the special issue," Ethnic and Racial Studies 48, no. 4 (2025): 695-717.
Bresselau von Bressensdorf, Agnes, ed., 2019, Über Grenzen: Migration und Flucht in Globaler Perspektive seit 1945, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Bouwman, Bastiaan, ed., 2026, "Special issue: Refugees and the Cold War," Cold War History, forthcoming.
Carling, Jørgen, 2023, "The phrase 'refugees and migrants' undermines analysis, policy and protection," International Migration 61, 3: 399-403.
Cohen, Gerard Daniel, 2012, In War's Wake: Europe's Displaced Persons in the Postwar Order, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Costello, Cathryn, 2018, "Refugees and (other) migrants: Will the Global Compacts ensure safe flight and onward mobility for refugees?" International Journal of Refugee Law 30, 4, 643-49.
Crawley, Heaven, and Dimitris Skleparis, 2018, "Refugees, migrants, neither, both: Categorical fetishism and the politics of bounding in Europe's 'migration crisis,'" Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44, 1: 48-64.
Erdal, Marta Bivand, and Ceri Oeppen, 2018, "Forced to leave? The discursive and analytical significance of describing migration as forced and voluntary," Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44, 6: 981-98.
FitzGerald, David Scott, 2019, Refuge Beyond Reach: How Rich Democracies Repel Asylum Seekers, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gabaccia, Donna R., 2022, "Historical migration studies: Time, temporality, and theory," in Caroline B. Brettell and James F. Hollifield, eds., Migration Theory, Abingdon: Routledge, 4th ed., 44-77.
Gatrell, Peter, 2013, The Making of the Modern Refugee, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gatrell, Peter, 2019, The Unsettling of Europe: How Migration Reshaped a Continent, New York: Basic Books, 2019.
Gatrell, Peter, et al., 2025, Refugee Voices in Modern Global History: Reckoning with Refugeedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hamed-Troyansky, Vladimir, 2024, Empire of Refugees: North Caucasian Muslims and the Late Ottoman State, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hamlin, Rebecca, 2021, Crossing: How We Label and React to People on The Move, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Huhn, Sebastian and Chistoph Rass, 2025, "Displaced person(s): the production of a powerful political category," Ethnic and Racial Studies, 48, 4, 718-39.
Jansen, Jan, Lässig, Simone, eds., 2020, Refugee Crises, 1945-2000: Political and Societal Responses in International Comparison, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kapoor, Ria, 2022 Making Refugees in India, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Langrognet, Fabrice, 2023, "The refugee-migrant distinction and the need for bridging analytical divides in the historiography," Journal of Migration History 9, 3, 245-68.
Long, Katy, 2013, "When refugees stopped being migrants: Movement, labour, and humanitarian protection," Migration Studies 1, 1, 4-26.
Lucassen, Jan, Lucassen, Leo, Manning, Patrick, 2010, "Migration history: Multidisciplinary approaches," in Id., eds., Migration History in World History: Multidisciplinary Approaches, Leiden and Boston: Brill.
Madokoro, Laura, 2016, Elusive Refuge: Chinese Migrants in the Cold War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Marfleet, Philip, 2025, "Unheard and forgotten-silencing refugees in modern history," in Johanna Leinonen, Miika Tervonen and Hans Otto Frøland, eds., Forced Migrants in Nordic Histories, Helsinki University Press, 21-44.
Mayblin, Lucy, 2017, Asylum after Empire: Colonial Legacies in the Politics of Asylum Seeking, London: Bloomsbury.
Moon, Yumi, ed., 2025, Cold War Refugees: Connected Histories of Displacement and Migration across Postcolonial Asia, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Moretti, Sebastién, 2022, The Protection of Refugees in Southeast Asia: A Legal Fiction? Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
Ngai, Mae, 2025, "The end of asylum," The New York Review of Books, 12 October 2025.
Noiriel, Gérard, 2012, Réfugiés et sans-papiers. La République face au droit d'asile XIXe-XXe siècle, Paris: Fayard.
Reed, Kate, and Marcia C. Schenck, eds., 2023, The Right to Research: Historical Narratives by Refugee and Global South Researchers, Montreal et al.: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Reinisch, Jessica and Matthew Frank, eds., 2014, "Special issue: Refugees and the nation-state in Europe, 1919-1959," Journal of Contemporary History 49, 3.
Schönhagen, Jakob, 2023, Geschichte der internationalen Flüchtlingspolitik 1945 - 1975, Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag.
Stone, Dan, 2018, "Refugees then and now: memory, history and politics in the long twentieth century," Patterns Prejudice, 52, 2-3, 101-6.
Struillou, Ana, Malika Zehni and Lamin Manneh, 2025, "Immobility," Past & Present, 268, 1, 286-319.
Taylor, Becky, et al., 2021, When Boat People were Resettled, 1975-1983: A Comparative History of European and Israeli Responses to the South-East Asian Refugee Crisis, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ther, Philipp, 2019, The Outsiders: Refugees in Europe Since 1492, Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press, trans. J. Riemer.
Thiollet, Hélène, Ferruccio Pastore and Camille Schmoll, 2024, "Does the forced/voluntary dichotomy really influence migration governance?" in Ettore Recchi and Mirna Safi, eds., Handbook of Human Mobility and Migration, Elgar, 221-41.
Yarnold, Barbara, 1990, Refugees without Refuge: Formation and Failed Implementation of U.S. Political Asylum Policy, Lanham: University Press of America.
Zetter, Roger, 1991, "Labelling refugees: Forming and transforming a bureaucratic identity," Journal of Refugee Studies, 4, 1: 39-62.
