This essay examines the unexplored topic of lawyers who represented slaves in the antebellum era. Drawing on a single case study, the paper recreates the story surrounding a legal dispute that arose when David Webster of Galveston, Texas, freed a slave woman named Betsy and left her all of his property in his will. The case was controversial; not only did it expose the existence of an interracial relationship but it also raised the troubling question of whether a black woman, on the eve of the Civil War, should be entitled to her freedom and to the considerable wealth that was left to her, including the home in which they had lived. In exploring these issues, the paper draws out the attorneys who represented Betsy, examining their efforts as well as their motivations to offer valuable insight into a world in which local experience and intimate matters upends some of our fundamental assumptions about race, law, and life during slavery times.On this topic, consult Yvonne M. Pitts, "'Imposing Their Wills: Inheritance Practices, Family, and Capacity in Nineteenth Century Kentucky" (Ph.D. diss., University of Iowa, 2006). Order No. DA3248047.
Thursday, September 13, 2012
Gilmer on the Emancipated Slave as Devisee
Posted by Dan Ernst
Jason Gillmer, Gonzaga University School of Law, has posted Lawyers and Slaves: A Remarkable Case of Representation from the Antebellum South, which appeared in University of Miami Race & Social Justice Law Review 1 (2011): 47. Here is the abstract: