The Constitution requires the consent of Congress before the United States can go to war. Truman’s decision to fight in Korea without gaining that consent was unconstitutional, says Griffin, but the acquiescence of Congress and the American people created a precedent for presidents to claim autonomy in this arena ever since. The unthinking extension of presidential leadership in foreign affairs to a point where presidents unilaterally decide when to go to war, Griffin argues, has destabilized our constitutional order and deranged our foreign policy. Long Wars and the Constitution demonstrates the unexpected connections between presidential war power and the constitutional crises that have plagued American politics.
The TOC:Contemporary presidents are caught in a dilemma. On the one hand are the responsibilities handed over to them by a dangerous world, and on the other is an incapacity for sound decisionmaking in the absence of interbranch deliberation. President Obama’s continuation of many Bush administration policies in the long war against terrorism is only the latest in a chain of difficulties resulting from the imbalances introduced by the post-1945 constitutional order. Griffin argues for beginning a cycle of accountability in which Congress would play a meaningful role in decisions for war, while recognizing the realities of twenty-first century diplomacy.
IntroductionAnd one of several impressive blurbs:
1. War Powers and Constitutional Change
2. Truman and the Post-1945 Constitutional Order
3. War and the National Security State
4. Vietnam and Watergate: The Post-1945 Constitutional Order in Crisis
5. The Constitutional Order in the Post-Vietnam Era
6. The 9/11 Wars and the Presidency
7. A New Constitutional Order?
Appendix: Executive Branch War Powers Opinions since 1950
“Stephen Griffin weaves legal, historical, and political analysis together to cast the constitutional order from 1945 to the present in a new and deeply informative light. His discussion of why Presidents have come to dominate war-making, and how that produces recurrent constitutional crises, is a major contribution to understanding how the Constitution works today.”—Mark Tushnet, author of Why the Constitution MattersFor a fuller description of the book, in Griffin's own words, check out this recent Balkinization post.