In 1936-1937, Justice George Sutherland wrote his only two United States Supreme Court opinions about freedom of expression. Sutherland’s majority opinion in Grosjean v. American Press Co. (1936) and his dissent in Associated Press v. NLRB (1937) set forth a novel and hybrid constitutional concept, the business of expression, which melded economic liberty and freedom of expression and reflected Sutherland’s aversion towards political factions and solicitude for private economic rights. In both cases Sutherland assessed economic regulations of the press through the prism of economic liberty and suggested that through partial laws – what Sutherland considered illegitimate class legislation – political factions sought to impede the business of expression. Sutherland’s analysis underscored the interplay between economic liberty and freedom of expression.
George Sutherland, J. (LC)
Monday, October 13, 2014
Oiken on Sutherland's Free Speech Cases
Samuel R. Olken, John Marshall Law School, has posted Justice George Sutherland and the Business of Expression, which is forthcoming in Judging Free Speech: First Amendment Jurisprudence of U.S. Supreme Court Justices. Here is the abstract: