Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Yoo on George Washington and Executive Power

George Washington
George Washington and Executive Power is a new paper by John Yoo, University of California at Berkeley School of Law.  The paper is from Yoo's new book, Crisis and Command: Executive Power from George Washington to George W. Bush (2010).  Here's the abstract:
This paper examines current debates over the scope of presidential power through the lens of the Washington administration. We tend to treat Washington’s decisions with an air of inevitability, but the constitutional text left more questions about the executive unanswered than answered.

Washington filled these gaps with a number of foundational decisions - several on a par with those made during the writing and ratification of the Constitution itself. He was a republican before he was a Federalist, but ultimately Washington favored an energetic, independent executive, even at the cost of political harmony. He centralized decision-making in his office, so that there would be no confusion about his responsibility and accountability. He took the initiative in enforcing the law and followed his own interpretation of the Constitution. He managed diplomatic relations with other countries and set the nation’s foreign policy. At the end of his two terms, the Presidency looked much like the one described in The Federalist Papers.

None of this was foreordained. Washington could have chosen to mimic a parliamentary system or a balanced government with executive branch officials drawn from an aristocratic social class. He could have considered the Presidency as Congress’s clerk, committing himself solely to carrying out legislative directions. He might even have thought of himself as the servant of the states. But instead he read his constitutional powers broadly to lead the nation through its first growing pains; restore the country’s finances; keep the nation out of a dangerous European war; open the West to American expansion; and see the Constitution through the appearance of the first political parties.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Query: Does John Yoo have any academic credibility to warrant your advertisement of his "scholarship"? To my mind, he is to scholarship as Fox News is to journalism.

Anonymous said...

Other than being a tenured law professor whose book on executive power was positively reviewed by the dean of American historians, Gordon Wood you mean?