In this forthcoming article, the author uses the protracted legal battles over the right of publicity stemming from the lasting celebrity created by the so-called “crime of the century” to propose a legal test for applying the right of publicity generally. These legal battles were fought during the 1960s over the right of celebrity slayer Nathan Leopold to control the use of his name and personality in a novel, movie, and stage play. After conflicting lower court decisions that had a chilling effect on writers and publishers, the case was eventually decided against Leopold. The author agrees with this result but argues that, because there has been a tendency to decide such disputes on a case-by-case basis, similar uncertainty continues to arise in analogous cases. He proposes a clear test, easily understood by both creators and users of celebrity personality, which would balance the interests of the parties and bring added predictability to this area of the law.
Monday, November 9, 2009
Larson on Rethinking the Right of Publicity Through the Leopold Case
Murder Will Out: Rethinking the Right of Publicity Through One Classic Case has just been posted by Edward Larson, Pepperdine University School of Law. It is forthcoming in the Rutgers Law Review (2009). Here's the abstract:
Image: Nathan F. Leopold, Jr.