Comparative Legal History 12:2 (2024) has been published. Here are the principal articles:
Why the rule of law? A historical perspective, by Fernanda Pirie (Open access).
Revisiting the history of colonialism and international law in Indonesia: the legacies of G. J. Resink, by Eka An AqimuddinWhy do we expect law to bring about better and more just societies? Around the world, systems of accountability are weak and dictators find ways to avoid the constraints of both national and international laws. Yet we continue to call for better laws and for aggressors to be tried for war crimes. This article brings a historical approach to this puzzle, considering some of the earliest known laws, from Mesopotamia, Rome, the Hindu and Islamic worlds and China. Drawing analogies with anthropological analysis of ritual, I suggest that such laws may portray an imagined world, one that people feel it worth invoking in the face of threats to the social order, uncontrolled aggression and the abuse of power. The paradox is that we believe in the rule of law and that we insist it should constrain power in practical and effective ways to be worth creating at all.
Power is exercised through truth claims, as seen in the case of Dutch colonialism in Indonesia. Gertrudes Johan Resink, a scholar of international law, successfully exposed the history of Dutch colonialism in Indonesia and demonstrated the pre-existence of international law before European expansion by considering the role of international law in Indonesia’s history. This article examines Resink’s legacy and the potential for elaborating further on his ideas in Indonesia’s history of international law. Although this article deals with a specific context, the Indonesian experience can contribute to the history and development of international law in the region more generally.
Moral rights and the protection of classics: A study of §51 in the Swedish Copyright Act of 1960, by Martin Fredriksson (Open access.)
This article examines §51 of the Swedish Copyright Act 1960, generally known as ‘the protection of classics’ in relation to international discourses on copyright in the mid-twentieth century. The provision in §51 protects works of cultural significance by deceased authors and artists against reproductions that are considered offensive, even if the works are in the public domain. This article analyses the arguments and motives that led Swedish legislators to draft §51 and contextualises them internationally. The origin of the protection of classics is rooted in the notion of a paying public domain, a provision which existed in various countries in the twentieth century that allowed the state to collect royalties for works in the public domain. In Swedish copyright law this economic right was reinterpreted as a moral right to protect classical works. Unlike conventional moral rights, this right aimed at protecting the interests of the public rather than the integrity of the author. The protection of classics, and to an extent the notion of a paying public domain, can be seen not so much as a regulation of intellectual property but more as a statement about cultural heritage. By showing how the protection of classics operated within the international discourse on copyright law of the twentieth century, this article explores the relation between moral rights, a paying public domain and cultural heritage.Book reviews
--Dan Ernst. H/t: ESCLH
