Symposium: The Worlds of Pre-Modern Neutrality (ca. 1400-1800): Norms, Institutions and Practices. Antwerp, May 8, 2025 - May 9, 2025
To ensure their security in a world dominated by competing Great Powers, states have the choice between an alliance or a neutral position. If we consider the world as governed by brute force, neutrality (the choice not to participate in a conflict between two or more other polities) would merely be a factual condition, dependent on the big players’ goodwill. Even today the ongoing war in Ukraine and the geopolitical tensions between China and the US pose existential challenges to third countries and their positioning, demonstrating the persistent vitality of the concept of neutrality in the 21st century. This equally reverberates on third states’ nationals and other non-state actors. The articulation of the set of rights and duties associated with neutrality has a long pedigree in legal history. The rhetorical use of legal arguments is intertwined with the protection of one’s territory and population but also with the interdependence that fosters trade, especially at sea, connecting markets, spaces and peoples. Law and power are never disconnected in matters related to neutrality, a mutual and reciprocal influence of both tenets is usually present.
This symposium aims to contribute new insights to the long-term history of neutrality, focusing on its ‘pre modern’ dimension broadly understood (ca. 1400-1800). Indeed, the law of neutrality started to emerge in the Early Modern Age through the practices and beliefs of the European state system, but also from its interactions with non-European normative and cultural systems. Different but complementary angles of approach can be used to understand this phenomenon: e.g. diplomatic history, IR history, political history, economic history and legal history. Throughout history, polities as well as private actors have interpreted neutrality in flexible and divergent ways, e.g. proposing a proactive-assertive approach or a more passive and inward looking one.
Benefiting from multiple disciplinary perspectives, the symposium takes into consideration both the theory and the practice of neutrality, advancing our knowledge of the often-contested conceptualisation of legal regimes at sea as well as on land. Such a conceptualisation depended on the interaction between situations of peace and war, diverging across different temporal and spatial coordinates. The participants’ contributions will also unravel the recurrent misalignment between legal-dogmatic approaches and practical uses of knowledge, as well as its intellectual and bureaucratic production. As such, the symposium participates in a broader turn to bottom-up approaches in the history of international law, a booming field of interdisciplinary research.
[Complete schedule here.]
