The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 was an important constitutional development in New Zealand. Twenty-one years after its enactment it appears to have made a positive contribution to the protection of human rights in New Zealand. It is a significant check on executive power. Perhaps the time has come to entrench the Bill of Rights Act and make it superior law. In this article the author, who was then the minister in charge of its production and parliamentary passage, looks at how the Bill of Rights Act has fared and considers its future. With a constitutional consideration now drawing to a close in New Zealand, the future of the Bill of Rights Act is being reviewed. The author considers that the Bill of Rights Act needs to be measured along with other constitutional changes. Thus, the wider context and the overall constitutional balance must be assessed before deciding where next the New Zealand constitutional caravan should travel. The author examines the nature of the constitutional consideration currently underway. He concludes there is a strong case for making the Bill of Rights Act superior law.
Tuesday, March 18, 2014
Palmer on the NZ Bill of Rights at 21
Posted by Dan Ernst
Geoffrey Winston Russell Palmer, Victoria University of Wellington, has posted The Bill of Rights after Twenty-One Years: The New Zealand Constitutional Caravan Moves On? Which appeared in the New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law 11 (2013): 257-88. Here is the abstract: