“Originalism requires that the Constitution be a type of document literally beyond the capacity and purpose of the framers,” writes
Mary Sarah Bilder, Boston College Law, in
an op-ed prompted by Judge Gorsuch’s confirmation hearings, in today’s
Boston Globe. And, while I’m on the topic of originalism,
here is my
Georgetown Law colleague
Randy Barnett’s response to
Jonathan Gienapp’s blog post,
Constitutional Originalism and History, and
here is an additional observation by another
Georgetown Law colleague,
Lawrence Solum.