Tuesday, January 9, 2018

CEU Fellowships in Demise of Constitutionalism

[We are moving this up because the deadline is fast approaching: Jan.15, 2018]
Image result for "central European university"
The Central European University's Legal Studies Department is offering two 12-month postdoctoral/research fellowships as part of its Demise of Constitutionalism Project. The deadline is Jan.15, 2018, but "applications are welcome continuously until the fellowships are awarded to suitable candidates."

Full details after the jump.
H/t: LSAtalk

Essays on the History of Parliamentary Procedure

Just out from Hart Publishing is Essays on the History of Parliamentary Procedure: In Honour of Thomas Erskine May, edited by Paul Evans, who is the Clerk of Committees in the House of Commons in Westminster:
8 February 2015 marked the 200th anniversary of the birth of Thomas Erskine May. May is the most famous of the fifty holders of the office of Clerk of the House of Commons. His continued renown arises from his Treatise upon the Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament, first published in 1844 and with its 25th edition currently in preparation. It is known throughout those parts of the world that model their constitutional arrangements on Westminster as the 'Bible of Parliamentary Procedure'. This volume celebrates both the man and his book. Bringing together current and former Clerks in the House of Commons and outside experts, the contributors analyse May's profound contribution to the shaping of the modern House of Commons, as it made the transition from the pre-Reform Act House to the modern core of the UK's constitutional democracy in his lifetime. This is perhaps best symbolised by its enforced transition between 1834 and 1851 from a mediaeval slum to the World Heritage Palace of Westminster, which is the most iconic building in the UK.

The book also considers the wider context of parliamentary law and procedure, both before and after May's time. It constitutes the first sustained analysis of the development of parliamentary procedure in over half a century, attempting to situate the reforms in the way the central institution of our democracy conducts itself in the political contexts which drove those changes.
Table of Contents after the jump.

Davies on the Motions Practice and Homes of the Fuller Court

Ross E. Davies, George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School, has posted Supreme Court Practice 1900: A Study of Turn-of -the-Century Appellate Procedure, Journal of Law 7 (2017): 33-46.  “In 1900 practice in the Supreme Court of the United States often involved direct dealings with individual Justices at their home offices. This paper sketches that aspect of appellate litigation at the turn of the century."  The article includes what Professor Davies aptly terms “Justice John Marshall Harlan’s rather chilling in-chambers opinion explaining his refusal to allow an appeal in a jury-and-race case.”

Monday, January 8, 2018

CFP: 2018 Law & Humanities Junior Scholar Workshop

[We are moving this up because of the extended deadline.]

[UPDATE:  The deadline for submissions to the 2018 Law & Humanities Junior Scholar Workshop has been extended to Monday, January 15, 2018.  We welcome submissions from all untenured professors, advanced graduate students, and post-doctoral scholars doing scholarly work in law and the humanities.]

Columbia Law School, the University of Southern California Center for Law, History & Culture, UCLA School of Law, Georgetown University Law School, Stanford Law School, and the University of Pennsylvania invite submissions for the annual meeting of the Law & Humanities Junior Scholar Workshop, to be held at Stanford Law School in Palo Alto, California, on June 4 and 5, 2018.

The paper competition is open to untenured professors, advanced graduate students, and post-doctoral scholars in law and the humanities. In addition to drawing from numerous humanistic fields, we welcome critical, qualitative work in the social sciences.  Based on anonymous evaluation by an interdisciplinary selection committee, between five and ten papers will be chosen for presentation at the June Workshop.  At the Workshop, two senior scholars will comment on each paper.  Commentators and other Workshop participants will be asked to focus specifically on the strengths and weaknesses of the selected scholarly projects, with respect to subject and methodology.  The selected papers will then serve as the basis for a larger conversation among all the participants about the evolving standards by which we judge excellence and creativity in interdisciplinary scholarship, as well as about the nature of interdisciplinarity itself.

Papers must be works-in-progress that do not exceed 15,000 words in length (including footnotes/endnotes); most papers selected for inclusion in recent years have been at least 10,000 words long.  An abstract of no more than 200 words must also be included with the paper submission.  A dissertation chapter may be submitted, but we strongly suggest that it be edited so that it stands alone as a piece of work with its own integrity.  A paper that has been submitted for publication is eligible for selection so long as it will not be in galley proofs or in print at the time of the Workshop; it is important that authors still be in a position at the time of the Workshop to consider comments they receive there and incorporate them as they think appropriate in their revisions.  We ask that those submitting papers be careful to omit or redact any information in the body of the paper that might serve to identify them, as we adhere to an anonymous or “blind” selection process.

The selected papers will appear in a special issue of the Legal Scholarship Network; there is no other publication commitment.  (We will accommodate the wishes of chosen authors who prefer not to have their paper posted publicly with us because of publication commitments to other journals.)  The Workshop will pay the domestic travel and hotel expenses of authors whose papers are selected for presentation.  For authors requiring airline travel from outside the United States, the Workshop will cover such travel expenses up to a maximum of $1000.

Submissions (in Word, no pdf files) will be accepted until January 5, 2018, and should be sent by e-mail to:  juniorscholarsworkshop@sas.upenn.edu.    Please be sure to include your name, institutional affiliation (if any), telephone and e-mail contact information in your covering email (not in the paper itself).

For more information, please send an email inquiry to juniorscholarsworkshop@sas.upenn.edu.  To see selected papers from some of the previous years’ workshops, go here.

Anne Dailey, University of Connecticut Law School
Katherine Franke, Columbia Law School
Sarah Barringer Gordon, University of Pennsylvania
Nan Goodman, University of Colorado
Ariela Gross, University of Southern California
Naomi Mezey, Georgetown University Law Center
Paul Saint-Amour, University of Pennsylvania
Hilary Schor, University of Southern California
Norman Spaulding, Stanford Law School
Clyde Spillenger, UCLA School of Law
Nomi Stolzenberg, University of Southern California
Martha Umphrey, Amherst College

Conveners

Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 58: 3-4

The trilingual Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis /Revue d'Histoire du Droit /The Legal History Review is out with a new combined issue, Volume 85, Issue 3-4 (2017).  It includes a paper just posted to SSRN: The Court of Common Pleas of East Florida 1763-1783, by Matthew Mirow, Florida International University College of Law:
Legal historians have surmised that court records of the British province of East Florida (1763-1783) have been either lost or destroyed. This assumption was based on the poor conditions for survival of documents in Florida and statements made in the secondary literature on the province. Nonetheless, a significant number of documents related to the courts of British East Florida exist in the National Archives (Kew). These materials reveal an active legal culture using English law in a wide range of courts including (1) the Court of Common Pleas; (2) the Court of Chancery; (3) the Court of General Sessions of the Peace, Oyer et Terminer, Assize and General Gaol Delivery; (4) Special Courts of Oyer et Terminer; (5) the Court of Vice-Admiralty; (6) the Court of Ordinary; (7) the General Court; and (8) a District Court.

This article studies a portion of the documents related to the Court of Common Pleas to describe the nature of the court's practice in civil litigation. It closely examines three cases for which sufficient extant pleadings permit the reconstruction of the general contours of recovery for breach of a sales contract through an action of trespass on the case, for contract enforcement through an action of covenant, and for recovery of a sum certain through an action of debt. This small window provided by these cases into the activities of this court reveals a heretofore unknown world of English common law in North America during and after the American Declaration of Independence. This new information supplements and challenges our established understanding of colonial law in the revolutionary period and the use of law in the British Empire. This study illustrates the many opportunities these sources offer to legal historians of the period.
TOC for the combined issues after the jump.

Haferkamp on the German Historical School

[We have the following announcement from our friends at the Max Planck Institute for European Legal History.]

Hans-Peter Haferkamp, Die Historische Rechtsschule (Studien zur europäischen Rechtsgeschichte 310), Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann 2018, ISBN 978-3-465-04332-4, IX, 396 p.

Enough books have been written about the German Historical School to fill entire libraries. Nevertheless, it is still difficult to determine who should be counted as a member of this school and who should not. One reason is that the traditional historical method, which dominated German legal historiography in the 20th century for quite some time, left marks that are still visible today. Eras have been interpreted through leading figures that supposedly matched the respective zeitgeist. The German Historical School has been identified with Friedrich Carl v. Savigny ever since. As a result, the research was focused on Savigny almost to the complete exclusion of his pupils.

As a group phenomenon, the German Historical School remains an amazing terra incognita to this day. This work attempts to reconstruct the German Historical School for the first time as an academic school and thereby as a context of communication for a great number of legal scholars. Three fields of legal activity within which the German Historical School presented itself as a unified whole will be examined: the jurist as a teacher, as a legal scholar and as a judge.

More information and TOC here.

Thank you and hello

First, I want to thank Karen, Dan, and Mitra for inviting me to guest blog this month. I have been an avid reader of LHB for years, but this month will be my first foray into blogging.  I’m looking forward to the conversations it will (hopefully) generate!

My plan is to write a series of posts about the (long) process of writing my first book, In the Shadow of Dred Scott: St. Louis Freedom Suits and the Legal Culture of Slavery in Antebellum America (UGA Press, 2017).  I have chosen to loosely organize these posts around the theme of “balance” while including a mix of discussions of my personal experience (and hopefully a few lessons learned) and some of the content of my work.  With a new year upon us, I am constantly reminded of how often I struggle with achieving any sort of balance in my work or my personal life.  I write these posts about balance, not because I am any sort of expert on getting things right; in fact, I’d say the opposite is usually true.  But I often think about, read about, and fumble along to achieve a rough kind of balance in the various areas of life (historian, teacher, mom of two).  It is my hope that these posts will provide fodder for conversation about other strategies, advice, or challenges LHB readers have faced along the way to publication, full-time teaching, and tenure and promotion.

Today, though, I will simply introduce my book.  It looks at the legal battles between enslaved people and their enslavers, using these court cases as a jumping off point for discussing local legal culture in the antebellum era.  The structure follows the basic stages of a suit for freedom, beginning with the statutes that allowed for this type of legal case, and concluding with a chapter on the broader political context of freedom suits, most notably the role of Dred Scott in regional and national politics in the decade prior to the American Civil War. 

The book has much to say to historians who are not specialists in legal history.  In it, I explain how these suits actually worked and how various actors interacted with the law.  But it is my hope that the book will also speak to legal scholars by investigating some of the nitty-gritty issues confronted by antebellum litigants.  It features discussions of the attorneys and judges involved in freedom suits, the arguments used for suing (and defending suits) for freedom, as well as the legal consciousness of the enslaved plaintiffs who brought almost 300 freedom suits in the St. Louis Circuit Court from 1814-1860. 

I conclude that enslaved persons in this urban environment had multiple avenues for learning about law and connecting with the arguments and the legal actors necessary to win freedom in court.  But bringing suit was not without its risks; many of the plaintiffs faced the grim reality of physical punishment, sale away from the court’s jurisdiction, or countless other horrors as a result of their legal action. 

The book includes some comparative context about freedom suits in other states, too.  Although some of the discussions of comparative case law ended up on the cutting room floor, I read nearly 1,000 state supreme court opinions to provide context for the St. Louis story.  One area where I do include broader data is in the appendix, which has a series of charts that indicate the arguments presented and rates of success for the St. Louis cases.  


In my next post, I will explain more about how I came to this topic by balancing a number of interests of mine and incorporating the wise counsel of legal historians and archivists. 

Fleming's "City of Debtors"

My Georgetown Law colleague Anne Fleming has just published City of Debtors: A Century of Fringe Finance with the Harvard University Press:
Since the rise of the small-sum lending industry in the 1890s, people on the lowest rungs of the economic ladder in the United States have been asked to pay the greatest price for credit. Again and again, Americans have asked why the most fragile borrowers face the highest costs for access to the smallest loans. To protect low-wage workers in need of credit, reformers have repeatedly turned to law, only to face the vexing question of where to draw the line between necessary protection and overreaching paternalism.

City of Debtors shows how each generation of Americans has tackled the problem of fringe finance, using law to redefine the meaning of justice within capitalism for those on the economic margins. Anne Fleming tells the story of the small-sum lending industry’s growth and regulation from the ground up, following the people who navigated the market for small loans and those who shaped its development at the state and local level. Fleming’s focus on the city and state of New York, which served as incubators for numerous lending reforms that later spread throughout the nation, differentiates her approach from work that has centered on federal regulation. It also reveals the overlooked challenges of governing a modern financial industry within a federalist framework.

Fleming’s detailed work contributes to the broader and ongoing debate about the meaning of justice within capitalistic societies, by exploring the fault line in the landscape of capitalism where poverty, the welfare state, and consumer credit converge.
Here are some endorsements:
Fleming’s fascinating, carefully researched study reveals the pivotal role New York played in the development of consumer-credit regulation. New York might be an outlier in the twenty-first century, but at the turn of the twentieth century, when small-sum loans originated, every major thread was connected to the events and personalities of New York.—Ronald J. Mann, author of Bankruptcy and the U.S. Supreme Court

Anne Fleming’s pathbreaking narrative of small-sum lending in New York City brings alive loan sharks, lenders seeking respectability, reformers, crusading lawyers, and the debtors themselves, all while focusing on a problem that plagues us to this day: the poor need money desperately, have little credit to obtain it, and thus are easy marks for exploitation.—Robert W. Gordon, author of Taming the Past: Essays on Law in History and History in Law

Loan sharks and banks reside on a single lending continuum. Fleming takes us to the only space on that continuum where marginal wage-earners could legally, albeit expensively, borrow money. City of Debtors is essential reading for anyone who would understand that world and its consequences, then and now.—Bruce H. Mann, author of Republic of Debtors: Bankruptcy in the Age of American Independence

It would be easy to get lost in the thicket of loopholes, appeals, FTC rules, ‘wage assignments,’ ‘waiver of defense clauses,’ and similar arcana, but Fleming is a surefooted guide. The reader comes out with a much deeper understanding of the shadowy, constantly changing landscape at the edges of standard finance and economic daily life.—Bethany Moreton, author of To Serve God and Wal-Mart: The Making of Christian Free Enterprise
Professor Fleming’s “Made by History” op-ed on the book is here.  She’ll be presenting it to the Washington History Seminar at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars on March 19.

Sunday, January 7, 2018

Sunday Book Review Roundup


Maya Jasanoff's biographical history of Joseph Conrad, The Dawn Watch: Joseph Conrad in a Global Worldis reviewed glowingly in The New Statesman.

Richard Aldous' biography of Schlesinger, Schlesinger: The Imperial Historian, is reviewed at HNN.  Also reviewed on the site is Building the Great Society: Inside Lyndon Johnson's White House by Joshua Zeitz.  Jennifer Frost's Producer of Controversy: Stanley Kramer, Hollywood Liberalism, and the Cold War is also reviewed.

Blitzed: Drugs in the Third Reich by Norman Ohler is reviewed in the Los Angeles Review of Books.

In The New Republic, a review essay on antiwar activism considers together Michael Kazin's War Against War: The American Fight for Peace, 1914-1918Oona Hathaway and Scott Shapiro's The Internationalists: How a Radical Plan to Outlaw War Remade the World, and L.A. Kaufman's Direct Action: Protest and the Reinvention of American Radicalism.  

In The Washington Post is a review of Noah Feldman's The Three Lives of James Madison: Genius, Partisan, PresidentAlso reviewed is Brenda Maddox's Reading the Rocks: How Victorian Geologists Discovered the Secret of Life.

In The New York Times, Jacqueline Jones is interviewed about her new biography of Lucy Parsons, Goddess of Anarchy: The Life and Times of Lucy Parsons, American Radical.  Also in the Times is a review of Lawrence O'Donnell's Playing with Fire: The 1968 Election and the Transformation of American Politics.  Also reviewed in the newspaper are two new popular histories of Istanbul, Bethany Hughes' Istanbul: A Tale of Three Cities and Richard Fidler's Ghost Empire: A Journey to the Legendary Constantinople.


Gary Fields' Enclosure: Palestinian Landscapes in a Historical Mirror is reviewed in The New York Review of Books.


The New Books Network has posted a range of interviews for the interested listener. David Carlson discusses his Imagining Sovereignty: Self-Determination in American Indian Law and Literature.  There is an interview with Elizabeth McRae about her Mothers of Massive Resistance: White Women and the Politics of White Supremacy.  Kay Wright Lewis talks about her A Curse upon the Nation: Race, Freedom, and Extermination in America and the Atlantic World.  Alice Echols is interviewed about her Shortfall: Family Secrets, Financial Collapse, and a Hidden History of American Banking.  Finally, Sarah Fishman speaks about her social history of gender and family in postwar France, From Vichy to the Sexual Revolution.

Saturday, January 6, 2018

Weekend Roundup

  •  Congratulations to Richard Boast, a legal historian of land law and Maori-Pakeha relations at the Victoria University Wellington, upon being named "an officer of the New Zealand Order of Merit in this year's New Year Honours."  H/t: NZ Herald 
  • We liked this appreciation of Brian Tierney, Cornell University, by a former doctoral student.
  • Lyman Johnson reviews Michelle A. McKinley's Fractional Freedoms: Slavery, Intimacy, and Legal Mobilization in Colonial Lima, 1600-1700, on H-Law.
  • Proposals for the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association are due January 16, 2018.
  • ICYMI: “Wyoming Supreme Court exhibit to highlight successes of women in the law” (Wyoming Tribune Eagle);  Also: two new historical entires on law school websites: Richard Chapman Weldon (1849–1925) at Dalhousie; some historical highlights at Columbia Law.
  Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers.

Friday, January 5, 2018

Ely on the Right to Acquire Property since Buchanan v. Warley

James W. Ely Jr., Vanderbilt University Law School, has posted Buchanan and the Right to Acquire Property, which is forthcoming in the Cumberland Law Review:
This article examines the impact of the Supreme Court decision in Buchanan v. Warley (1917) invalidating residential segregation laws as a deprivation of property rights without due process of law. The decision was premised on a strong affirmation of the right to acquire property. The article explores the historical background and contemporary significance of the right to acquire property. It notes that early state constitutions expressly recognized such a right. It points out that the right to acquire found practical expression in hostility to state-conferred monopoly and in the right to follow common occupations, two doctrines which evolved under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The article stresses that the right to acquire property, as in Buchanan, serves to protect the interests of the economically disadvantaged, racial minorities, and fledgling entrepreneurs.

Although courts continued to invoke the right to acquire property, by the early twentieth century such right was increasingly limited by the spread of occupational licensing and enactment of laws hampering competition in certain businesses. This trend was facilitated by the emergence of New Deal jurisprudence which downplayed the rights of property owners and emphasized judicial deference to the economic judgment of legislators. As judicial review of economic regulations became largely perfunctory, occupational licensing and entry barriers proliferated in the years following World War II. Recently, however, some courts have looked skeptically at laws restricting entry into common occupations. The article concludes that the right to acquire property, although often ignored, retains some vitality.

AHA Grants& Fellowships

The American Historical Association has a series of grants and fellowships with an application deadline of Feb.15, 2018. These include:

Further information is available here.

H/t: Perspectives on History

Welcome, Kelly Kennington!

Credit
It is our pleasure to welcome a new guest blogger this month: Professor Kelly Kennington. She is Associate Professor of History at Auburn University, where she teaches courses on the history of the South, American Slavery, and American Legal history, as well as survey courses in World history and U.S. history. She is the author of In the Shadow of Dred Scott: St. Louis Freedom Suits and the Legal Culture of Slavery in Antebellum America, which was published by the University of Georgia Press in April 2017.

Prior to joining the faculty at Auburn, Kennington was the Law and Society Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Wisconsin's Law School. She received her Ph.D. in History from Duke University in 2009.

Welcome, Kelly Kennington!

Thursday, January 4, 2018

University Assistantship in Legal and Constitutional History at Vienna

[We have the following announcement.]

University Assistant (prae doc) at the Department of Legal and Constitutional History (Closing on January 23)

The University of Vienna (15 faculties, 4 centres, about 174 fields of study, approx. 9.500 members of staff, more than 94.000 students) seeks to fill the position as soon as possible of a
University Assistant (prae doc) at the Department of Legal and Constitutional History.

The department is part of the Vienna Law School. The function of the department is research and academic teaching in the scope of Legal- and Constitutional history (focusing on history of private and constitutional law.). The department services about 1.500 students each year.

Herzog on European Law

Out now by Tamar Herzog, Harvard University is A Short History of European Law: The Law Two and a Half Millenia with Harvard University Press. From the publisher: 
Cover: A Short History of European Law in HARDCOVERTo many observers, European law seems like the endpoint of a mostly random walk through history. Certainly the trajectory of legal systems in the West over the past 2,500 years is far from self-evident. In A Short History of European Law, Tamar Herzog offers a new road map that reveals underlying patterns and unexpected connections. By identifying what European law was, where its iterations could be found, who was allowed to make and implement it, and what the results were, she ties legal norms to their historical circumstances, and allows readers to grasp their malleability and fragility.
Herzog describes how successive European legal systems built upon one another, from ancient times through the establishment and growth of the European Union. Roman law formed the backbone of each configuration, though the way it was understood, used, and reshaped varied dramatically from one century and place to the next. Only by considering Continental civil law and English common law together do we see how they drew from and enriched this shared tradition.

Expanding the definition of Europe to include its colonial domains, Herzog explains that British and Spanish empires in the New World were not only recipients of European legal traditions but also incubators of new ideas. Their experiences, as well as the constant tension between overreaching ideas and naive localism, explain how European law refashioned itself as the epitome of reason and as a system with potentially global applications.
Praise for the book: 


“Herzog’s book is a remarkable achievement, sure to become a go-to text for scholars and students alike. Comprehensive and concise, it bridges the Continental and Anglo-American traditions and focuses on vital questions of legal authority and legitimacy. It is a must-read for anyone eager to understand the origins of core legal concepts and institutions—like due process and rule of law—that profoundly shape the societies in which we live today.”-Amalia D. Kessler

“Few histories are more consequential than those of our laws, since how we imagine the relationship of our laws to their past can itself affect the present of our polities. How surprising, then, that few historians have dared to confront the vastness of that history. Herzog’s lapidary book is much vaster than even its title suggests and is required reading for Americanists North and South, and indeed, for all of us inhabiting a postcolonial world deeply marked by the millennia of legal imaginings whose dynamic transformations it so lucidly charts.”-David Nirenberg

“A fundamental and timely contribution to the understanding of Europe as seen through its legal systems. Herzog masterfully shows the profound unity of legal thinking and practices across the Continent and in England. This will become required reading for students and scholars across the social sciences.”-Federico Varese

Further information is available here.

CFP: ANZLHS 2018

[And, while we're at it, why don't we post the call for papers for the Australian and New Zealand Law and History Society's next meeting.]

Exclusion, Confinement, Dispossession: Uneven Citizenship and Spaces of Sovereignty.  University of Wollongong, 10-12 December 2018

In 2018 the conference will be held adjacent to the Conference of the Law and Society Association of Australia and New Zealand (LSAANZ), which will run from 12-15 December, also in Wollongong. Our conferences will feature a joint keynote address from Professor Renisa Mawani, University of British Columbia, with further keynotes and plenary speakers TBA.

In the context of the humanitarian crisis on Manus Island, recent developments around marriage equality, Brexit, renewed US immigration restrictions, and the assertion of Indigenous sovereignty embodied in the Uluru Statement from the Heart, we invite submissions that reflect on the variety of ways that legal regimes have historically produced exclusion, confinement and dispossession. We particularly encourage papers that explore citizenship and sovereignty – and the changing legal contexts that have shaped these concepts over time.

Paper proposals might consider the following themes: indigenous sovereignty and treaties; marriage, intimacy and intimate lives; citizenship and the production of difference; biopolitics; Slavery and Trafficking; Borders/Border crossings/Colonial (im)mobilities; and imprisonment/confinement/carceral spaces

We are calling for proposals of both individual papers (20mins) and panels of either 3 or 4 speakers. Individual paper proposal should include an abstract of not more than 300 words and a 100-word biographical statement for each speaker. For panels, please also include a title and brief rationale for panels as a whole. Please send proposals to cass-admin@uow.edu.au by 20 July 2018.

Conference Convenors:  Jane Carey, Julia Martinez and Sharon Crozier-de Rosa.  Hosted by the Colonial and Settler Studies Centre, University of Wollongong

law&history 2017:2

Volume 2 for 2017 of law&history, the journal of the Australian and New Zealand Law and History Society has been published. It is a special issue devoted to Gender, Intimacy and Colonial Violence.

Editor’s Comments: Diane Kirkby

1. Lyndall Ryan Billibellary, the Formation of the Native Police Force in the Port Phillip District in 1837 and its Connection to the Batman Treaty of 1835

2. Penelope Edmonds Emancipation Acts on the Oceanic Frontier? Intimacy, Diplomacy, Colonial Invasion and the Legal Traces of ‘Protection’ in the Bass Strait World, 1832

3. Angela Wanhalla Intimate Connections: Governing Cross-Cultural Intimacy on New Zealand’s Colonial Frontier

4. Anna Johnston The Language of Colonial Violence: Lancelot Threlkeld, Humanitarian Narratives and the New South Wales Law Courts

5. Amanda Nettelbeck Interracial Intimacy, Indigenous Mobility and the Limits of Legal Regulation in Two Late Settler Colonial Societies

6. Victoria Haskins ‘A Troublesome Gin Like Annie’: Masculinity, Race and Intimate Violence in Federation-Era North Queensland

OBITUARY

7. Julie Evans A Life ‘Unthinking and Undoing Colonialism’ Tracey Banivanua Mar (1974–2017)

REVIEW ESSAY

8. Ben Saul Australian Trials of Japanese War Crimes Review of Georgina Fitzpatrick, Tim McCormack and Narrelle Morris, Australia’s War Crimes Trials 1945–51

BOOK REVIEWS

Penelope Edmonds, Settler Colonialism and (Re)conciliation: Frontier Violence, Affective Performances, and Imaginative Refoundings (Ben Silverstein)

Cynthia Banham, Liberal Democracies and the Torture of Their Citizens (George Williams)

Tanya Evans, Fractured Families: Life on the Margins in Colonial New South Wales (Alecia Simmonds)

John Murphy, Evatt: A Life (Frank Bongiorno)

Wednesday, January 3, 2018

SLS Conference Celebrating Gordon's "Taming the Past"

Next Friday and Saturday, January 12-13, 2018, Stanford Law School and the Stanford Center for Law and History will host a conference in honor of the publication of Robert Gordon's Taming the Past: Essays on Law in History and History in Law (Cambridge University Press, 2017).  

Participants include Amalia Kessler (Stanford Law), Norman Spaulding (Stanford Law), Sarah Barringer Gordon (Penn Law), John Fabian Witt (Yale Law), Laura Kalman (UC Santa Barbara History Dept.), Kenneth W. Mack (Harvard Law), William Simon (Stanford and Columbia Law Schools), Serena Mayeri (Penn Law), Jed Shugerman (Fordham Law), Lawrence Friedman (Stanford Law), Barbara Fried (Stanford Law),  Carol Rose (Yale & Univ. of Arizona Law Schools), Robert Weisberg (Stanford Law ), William Forbath (Texas Law School), Alison LaCroix (Univ. of Chicago Law), John Schlegel (Univ. of Buffalo School of Law), Tom Grey (Stanford Law), Claire Priest (Yale Law),  Susanna Blumenthal (Univ. of Minnesota Law), David Rabban (Texas Law), Hendrik Hartog (Princeton Univ. History Dept.), Reva Siegel (Yale Law), Christopher Tomlins (Berkeley Law ), Sophia Lee (Penn Law), Risa Goluboff (Dean, Univ. of Virginia Law), Sara Mayeux (Vanderbilt Law), Roy Kreitner (Tel Aviv Univ. Law), Ariela Gross (Univ. of Southern California Law), Kunal Parker (Univ. of Miami Law) -- and, of course, Bob Gordon.

The full program is available here.

To register (free, but limited availability), follow the link.

Mehrotra on Taxation and the Modern State

Ajay K. Mehrotra, American Bar Foundation and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, has posted Fiscal Forearms: Taxation as the Lifeblood of the Modern Liberal State, which appears in The Many Hands of the State: Theorizing the Complexities of Political Authority and Social Control, eds. Kimberly Morgan and Ann Orloff (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017)
For nearly all advanced industrialized nation-states, taxation is the central source of public revenue. Indeed, taxation is the one policy area without which nearly all of the other functions and aspects of the modern state would not be possible. Thus, to continue the Bourdieuian metaphor of a body politic that frames this edited volume, taxation is the lifeblood of the effective, modern, liberal state. Like blood itself, taxation does much more than provide material sustenance for the body politic. Because taxation is one of the most widely and persistently experienced relationships that individuals have with their government, it helps us define the meaning of fiscal citizenship. Taxation institutionalizes the concept of a social contract between the state and its citizens, between the sovereign and its subjects.

This paper, which is part of a collection of essays, explores the central role of taxation to the development of an effective, modern state. After reviewing some of the classic social and economic literature on how taxation is the key link between war and state formation, this paper investigates how scholars have recently begun to go beyond the conventional view of taxation as simply a source of material resources, to examine the historical relationship between taxation and citizenship. There is perhaps no better example of how taxation has shaped social and cultural conceptions of fiscal citizenship than the U.S.’s adoption of direct and progressive taxation in the early twentieth century. Using the United States during this period as a case study, this paper shows how American reformers deliberately deployed a particular vision and idiom about taxation to help lawmakers and ordinary Americans reimagine the financial basis of government programs.

Tuesday, January 2, 2018

Grotiana 38

Volume 38 (2017) of Grotiana is now out.   The journal, as Brill’s website explains,
appears under the auspices of the Grotiana Foundation. The journal’s leading objective is the furtherance of the Grotian tradition. It welcomes any relevant contribution to a better understanding of Grotius’ life and works. At the same time close attention will be paid to Grotius’ relevance for present-day thinking about world problems. Grotiana therefore intends to be a forum for exchanges concerning the philosophical, ethical and legal fundamentals of the search for an international order.

    Acceptilatio. Hugo Grotius on Satisfaction
        Johannes Magliano-Tromp
     
    Having Made Peace through the Blood of the Cross
        Eltjo Schrage
     
    Too Subtle to Satisfy Many: Was Grotius’s Teleology of Punishment Predestined to Fail?
        Jeremy Seth Geddert
     
    Punishment and Sovereignty in De Indis and De iure belli ac pacis
        Brad Hinshelwood
     
    Grotius and Kant on Original Community of Goods and Property
        Sylvie Loriaux
     
    Grotius, Necessity and the Sixteenth-Century Scholastic Tradition
        Bart Wauters
     
    Hugo Grotius in Dialogue with His Colleagues
        Lydia Janssen
     
    Pirating Mare liberum (1609)
        Mark Somos and Dániel Margócsy
      
    Adam Smith’s Unfinished Grotius Business, Grotius’s Novel Turn to Ancient Law, and the Genealogical Fallacy
        Benjamin Straumann
     
    Christian Wolff’s Lectures on Grotius’s De Iure Belli ac Pacis from 1739–1740
        Frank Grunert and Béla Kapossy

CFP: Stanford Program in Law & Society 5th Conference for Junior Researchers

[We have the following announcement.]

We are happy to announce the call for papers for Stanford Program in Law and Society's 5th Conference for Junior Researchers to be held at Stanford Law School on May 11-12, 2018.

The theme for next year's conference is "Law in Everyday Life," and it is meant to encourage empirical work in the field of law and society.


Deadline to submit abstracts: February 5, 2018.

H/t: H-Law