Showing posts with label Lectures Conferences and Calls for Papers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lectures Conferences and Calls for Papers. Show all posts

Saturday, May 16, 2026

Weekend Roundup

  • We have two reports of Maggie Blackhawk's discussion at Dartmouth College on May 6 of "the centrality of American colonialism and Native American history to legal understandings of the United States Constitution (The Dartmouth; Dartmouth News).  
  • Lucy Salyer, University of New Hampshire, explains Wong Kim Ark and birthright citizenship on NBC News' "Here's the Scoop" (YouTube).
  • Rebecca Tushnet's 2025 Nies Lecture on Intellectual Property at Marquette Law School, entitled  “History and Tradition in First Amendment Intellectual Property Cases” is here.
  • That symposium over at Balkinization on Stephen Skowronek's The Adaptability Paradox is now complete and is available here.
  • More on the litigation over the executive order curtailing the Presidential Records Act: Jonathan Shaub scores the government lawyers who defended the executive order (Lawfare).  The American Historical Association explains a recent hearing in the dispute.  
  • Michael C. Blumm, Lewis and Clark Law School, has posted the preface, table of contents, and first chapter of the second edition of his West Nutshell, A Brief American Legal History, which surveys "American legal history from the Colonial Era to the Trump administration, including an extensive chapter on the first six months of the second Trump administration." 
  • John O. McGinnis reviews The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution: A Thousand-Year History by Mark Peterson (Law & Liberty). 
  • ICYMI:  Florida’s new history course whitewashes the founders on slavery (Salon)

Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers. 

Wednesday, February 18, 2026

Siddali to Speak on 19th-Century US Constitutions in Comparative Perspective

[Via H-Law, we have the following announcement.  DRE.]

Please join the State Constitutions Lab on Thursday February 26 @ 1:00 PM (Eastern US) for a Zoom seminar with Silvana R. Siddali, [St. Louis University, to discuss her paper "Fire Eaters, Revolutionaries, and the Rule of Law: Nineteenth Century State Constitutions in Comparative Perspective."

[Professor Siddali's] area of specialization includes constitutional, legal, and political history of the United States, in particular, the role of human rights in the development of democratic and judicial institutions.  Her current book, Transatlantic Constitution-making: Struggles over Democracy, the Rule of Law, and Human Rights, 1820-1870 is under contract at Johns Hopkins University Press and focuses on nineteenth-century transatlantic political communities that were connected through an exchange of ideas, trade, migrations, and technological innovations.

This meeting will be held on Zoom and a copy of the paper will be sent to all who RSVP here.

Monday, February 16, 2026

Penningroth in Conversation at the University of Nebraska

[We have the following announcement from our friends at the U.S. Law and Race Initiative of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.  DRE.]

Join us this Friday, Feb 20 from 1:30-2:30pm (cst) for an in-depth conversation between Dylan Penningroth and Will Thomas on the power of family and local archives in telling Black legal histories. Register now to join the discussion via zoom.

Sunday, February 8, 2026

Sunday Roundup

  • Aziz Rana, Boston College, will discuss his book, The Constitutional Bind: How Americans Came to Idolize a Document That Fails Them, as the 21st Annual Pro Lecture in Legal History at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, on Monday, February 23, 2026, 12:15 p.m.–1:15 p.m. in the Thomas & Mack Moot Court Building. 
  • The University of St. Thomas's notice of Anthony M. Joseph's amicus brief in Chiles v. Salazar on the history of medical licensing in the United States.
  • Adam Feldman on How academic briefs shape Supreme Court decisions (SCOTUSblog).

--Dan Ernst

Sunday, January 18, 2026

Sunday Roundup

  • Also newly available online: Michael McConnell and Noah Rosenblum's debate on originalism at NYU Law on November 19, 2025. 
  • William M. Treanor, the Agnes Williams Sesquicentennial Professor of Constitutional Law and Constitutional History and Dean Emeritus of Georgetown Law, will deliver the 2025 Gouverneur Morris Endowed Lecture of the Bronx County Historical Society at Fordham Law, which is co-sponsoring the event, on Wednesday, January 28, 2025 at 6:30 pm.  Dean Treanor’s topic: “The Constitution’s Penman, Gouverneur Morris" (New York Almanack).  
  • Jeremy Kessler on the law and history of bans on history of viewpoint discrimination at a Columbia Law School alumni luncheon.  (The event is called the "Stone Circle" Luncheon, and I'm embarrassed to say I was slow to get the reference.)  (Columbia Law School). 
  • Heidi Kitrosser reviews Patrick G. Eddington, The Triumph of Fear: Domestic Surveillance and Political Repression from McKinley to Eisenhower (Georgetown University Press, 2025) (Lawfare).

--Dan Ernst 

Wednesday, November 12, 2025

Williams to Lecture on Precedent in Star Chamber

On Thursday, November 20, from 18:00 to 19:30, Ian Williams, St. John’s College, Oxford University, will speak on "Precedent and Sovereignty in Early-Modern Equity: The View from the Star Chamber" as the annual History of Law and Governance Centre lecture at the University of Nottingham in Room B55 Law & Social Sciences Building.  Here is Dr. Williams’s abstract:

In this lecture I shall investigate the history of precedent in early-modern equity. Precedent played a central role in equity changing from its origin as exceptional discretionary justice to its more familiar form as a body of law within the English legal system. However, the sources for examining the role of precedent in equity are very limited, if we constrain ourselves to the major private law equity courts of Chancery and Exchequer. Using the reports of cases in the criminal equity court of Star Chamber provides a much larger body of sources. Star Chamber material also enables us to consider an early-modern theorisation of equity as an emanation of sovereignty, in which deciding cases could be understood as an aspect of sovereignty and precedent as a form of legislation, and see this legislative activity in operation.

The lecture will draw upon Dr. Williams's ongoing research on the court of Star Chamber, including his editing of a volume of seventeenth century law reports and a study of the court as a provider of criminal equity.

--Dan Ernst 

Wednesday, April 16, 2025

Bentham, the Panopticon, and "A Picture of the Treasury"

Jeremy Bentham (NYPL)
[Via H-Law, we have the following announcement.  DRE]

Jeremy Bentham, the Panopticon penitentiary scheme, and "A Picture of the Treasury"

The aim of the conference is to discuss the forthcoming critical edition of "A Picture of the Treasury" in The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham (UCL Press), publishing for the first time Bentham’s personal account of his dealings with the government, most notably the Treasury department, but also the Home Office, in his attempts to erect, and to become governor of, a panopticon penitentiary.

"A Picture of the Treasury" (written in 1802) contains Bentham’s highly detailed reflections on his dealings with and treatment by government officials between 1798 and 1802, and gives a unique insight into how he felt at this time. He exposes the individuals by whom, and administrative processes and malpractices by which, he believed his interests, and the public interest at large, had been thwarted. Bentham states, for instance, that his "adversary," the British government, had all along sought to abandon the panopticon scheme by making things so drawn out that he might have been "provoked … beyond endurance," give up through "weariness and despondency," or simply die—die either "in the natural way of things," as a result of "wear and tear of vexations and disappointments," or even by him being driven to suicide.

The text consists of twenty-four sections, which are interspersed with over one hundred pieces of documentary evidence, including letters sent and unsent, extracts from official documents and third-party correspondence, alongside Bentham’s own commentary, all of which, Bentham says, might serve in prompting people to ask, "Well—and when this came out—what were your feelings?—and how did you endure it?"

To register and for more details, and to download a preliminary version of A Picture of the Treasury, please visit the conference website [here].  

Schedule after the jump.

Saturday, February 1, 2025

Weekend Roundup

  • Dylan C. Penningroth will deliver Hidden Histories of Black Civil Rights, the 2025 Pro Lecture in Legal History at the William S. Boyd School of Law at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, in conjunction with the UNLV Department of History, at 5:30 on February 11.  The program is free, but registration is required. 
  • John Fabian Witt will deliver "Antagonists and Enablers: A First Draft History of Biden and the Supremes," the Mitchell Lecture for Spring 2025, at 2 p.m. on March 14, at the Charles B. Sears Law Library, John Lord O’Brian Hall, University at Buffalo (North Campus).  Robert H. Jackson delivered the first Mitchell Lecture in 1951, titled “Wartime Security and Liberty Under Law.”  Other Mitchell Lecturers include Derrick Bell, Paul Freund, Lawrence Friedman, Carol Gilligan, Sheila Jasanoff, Duncan Kennedy, Karl Llewellyn, Stuart Macaulay, Catharine MacKinnon, and Richard Posner.  So, no pressure.  Register here to attend.
  • Former LHB blogger and president-elect of the American Society for Legal History Mitra Sharafi has won the Indian Law Review's article prize for 2023 for "Indian constitutionalism, the rule of law, and Parsi legal culture," which is available, open access, here
  • The organizing committee of the eighth European Society for Comparative Legal History’s biennial conference, "Back to the Past and Building the Future,” to be held at Szeged, Hungary, on July 2-3, 2025, “has launched a website containing information on accommodation, traveling, membership fee and registration fee.”  H/t: ESCHblog.  
  • The Sandra Day O’Connor Institute for American Democracy, the National Constitution Center and the Organization of American Historians are sponsoring a week-long, intensive summer workshop for “social studies educators who currently work in sixth–12th grade classrooms who have an interest in learning more about the history of the U.S. Constitution,” from Sunday, June 22-Friday, June 27.  It opens with a panel discussion including Jeffrey Rosen, David Blight, and Akhil Amar, which will be open to the general public and livestreamed.  More.
  • Congratulations to former LHB Blogger Emily Prifogle upon the Michigan Law faculty's vote to award her tenure.  H/T: WAKL
  • Former LHB Guest Blogger Marie-Amélie George reviews Margot Canaday’s Queer Career in LHR.
  • We did not know there was a Treasury Historical Association, much less that it awards a research prize, but we're glad we do now.  Let's get going on the history of this.
  • Here is the CFP for the annual meeting of the American Historical Association, to be held in Chicago, January 8-11, 2016. 
  • ICYMI: David Blight on birthright citizenship (The Atlantic).  Mark Thomas on originialism and impoundment (Notice & Comment). Howard University “Celebrates the Life of Alumnus Henry L. Marsh III" (Howard).

Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History blogger.

Tuesday, August 27, 2024

Colonial Legacies in Public Law

[We have the following announcement.  DRE]

Call for Applications: Colonial Legacies in Public Law: histories, theories, pitfalls and potentials.  Tuesday, January 14, 2025 - Thursday, January 16, 2025, 12:00 PM - 5:00 PM.  Organisers: Mohsin Bhat, Tanzil Chowdhury and Eva Nanopoulos.

The Queen Mary Centre of Law and Society in a Global Context (CLSGC) is thrilled to announce a Masterclass with Professor Philipp Dann that will take place on 14-16 January 2025.

The legacies of empire and colonialism are becoming visible everywhere these days. They shape various debates in public law but also indicate a new phase of globalization. The Masterclass will study these legacies and discuss their various dimensions and implications in comparative constitutional, public international and European Union law. The Class will draw on history and political theory, especially post-/decolonial theories to contextualize public law. It will use examples (such as the concept of development and democracy) to understand how empire and colonialism have shaped constitutional, international and European Union law and their scholarly reflection over time. But it will also turn to the future and ask participants to explore the potentials (and pitfalls) for re-imagining public law and its scholarship in the 21st century through the colonial lens. The Class is an invitation to rethink public law and the role of legal scholarship in a truly global way mindful of the broader legacies of modernity and colonialism.

Please note the start and end times listed are provisional and will be confirmed at a later date.

Overview of the sessions

Session 1: Comparative Constitutional Law, the Southern Turn and Reflexive Globalization – argument and framing

On the first day, the general theme of the class will be introduced and a framework of analysis established. This includes a basic engagement with colonial history and postcolonial thought as well as a reflection on the attention of public law scholarship to these dimensions so far. The class will discuss the overarching argument that a ‘Southern Turn’ and an understanding of colonial legacies provides a foundation to rethink the conceptual vocabulary of public law in the 21st century. Comparative constitutional law is a paramount area for such reflexive rethinking of public law theory.

Session 2: International law and the concept of development

The second day will turn to international law, the scholarship of which was the first to engage with colonial legacies. The class will situate and discuss Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL). It will then engage in particular with the concept of development as the central paradigm to structure South-North relations in the 20th century and study its implications for international institutional, economic and human rights law in shaping international law up until today.

Session 3: Constitutional thought in reflexive globalization: examples of temporality and democracy

On day Three, the class will return to the initial argument that basic notions and the conceptual vocabulary of public law are in (and need) a process of reflexive rethinking in order to grasp and structure the realities of public authority in the multipolar world of the 21st century. The class will turn to two examples that will demonstrate this process and possible outcomes of such reflexive rethinking. One is the perspective of time and temporality that allows us to highlight distinct elements of public law; the other example is democracy, a universally used notion, which still rests on conceptual considerations arising from 19th and early 20th century Europe even though it has traveled long ago.

Session 4: European Public Law and the legacies of Empires

Scholarship on the law of the European Union as well as the law of European states has been late in engaging with postcolonial perspectives. Day Four of the class will engage with reasons for this obliviousness – and then examine various colonial legacies in these two and entangled bodies of public law. Through the colonial lens, concept such as the state (and community of states), citizenship and the common market take on new contours and become more contested and less solid as generally assumed.

About Professor Philipp Dann.  Philipp Dann is Professor at Humboldt University Berlin, where he holds the Chair in Public and Comparative Law. His research focuses on the role of law in the encounter and entanglement between South and North – in international, comparative and European law, in legal theory and legal history. He has published three monographs, ten edited volumes and is the editor-in-chief of the quarterly journal “World Comparative Law”. He is a co-founder of the ‘Law and Development Research Network’, a co-chair of the ICON chapter Germany and a principal investigator at research clusters ‘Contestations of the Liberal Script’ and ‘Varieties of Constitutionalism’. He has advised governments and other parties on constitutional matters and questions of law and development.

Format.  The Class will be text- and discussion-oriented, based on a reader comprising texts by Professor Dann and other eminent works in the field. It will unfold through four sessions of 3 hours each.   Each session will be composed of three elements: An introductory lecture by Professor Dann on the theme; discussions among smaller groups on the lecture and the assigned readings guided by an open set of questions; and a plenary discussion on the theme with Professor Dann.

Application process.  The Class is addressed to academic researchers (including PhD and postdoctoral students) with research interests broadly aligned within the themes of the Class.  Applications should be sent to Eva Nanopoulos: e.nanopoulos@qmul.ac.uk by the 20 September, with the following information:  Name; Current institution; Country of origin; Gender; Statement of interest (500 words); CV upload (up to 3 or 4 pages).

Monday, August 19, 2024

OAH Webinar: The Supreme Court in Historical Perspective

[We have the following announcement from the Organization of American Historians.  DRE.]

The Supreme Court in Historical Perspective: A Future of the Past Webinar

Join us on Thursday, August 22, 6pm ET, for a conversation about the history of the Supreme Court and its role in American life and politics. Host Holly Brewer, from the University of Maryland, will be joined by panelists Michael Klarman of Harvard University and Donna Scheule of California State University-Los Angeles, for this hour-long conversation. Registration is required for this free event.

[We assume that, as it did for past webinars, OAH will post a recording of this one on its YouTube channel.]

Saturday, June 22, 2024

Weekend Roundup

  • Justin Simard, Michigan State University Law School, on the Citing Slavery Project (The Conversation).
  • Giuliana Perrone, UC Santa Barbara, from Juneteenth to Reparations (The Current).
  • Amy Hart, UC Davis, says historians have a difficult task in guiding Supreme Court justices because 2024 is not 1789 or 1866 (The Conversation).
  • The National Constitution Center honors the civil rights lawyer William T. Coleman, Jr., with a bronze bas-relief (WHYY).
  • A historical marker for Emma Coger, refused a seat at a table of white women on the steamboat S.S. Merrill, despite her first-class ticket, in 1872 (Quincy, IL Herald-Whig).
  • As Vanderbilt Law’s George Barrett Social Justice Lecture, Sara Mayeux and Robert L. Tsai discuss Tsai's Demand the Impossible: One Lawyer’s Pursuit of Equal Justice for All (Norton 2024) (YouTube).
  • Undergraduates can again research slavery cases this summer in the University of Nebraska–Lincoln’s Center for Digital Research in the Humanities, led by Katrina Jagodinsky (Nebraska Today).
  • The Lawbook Exchange's June 2024 catalogue of Scholarly Law and Legal History is here.
Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers.

Monday, May 13, 2024

Visions and Realities of Black Freedom in the Nineteenth Century

[We have the following announcement from the Kluge Center via the American Historical Association.  DRE]

Visions and Realities of Black Freedom in the Nineteenth Century.  Wednesday, May 15, 4 p.m. ET

Join the John W. Kluge Center at the Library of Congress for an online event exploring how the United States grappled with the post-emancipation future for Black Americans. In the years preceding and during the American Civil War, antislavery reformers began to imagine what a world without slavery might look like—what shape a post-emancipation society might take. As such ideas clashed with realities in the wake of wartime emancipation, activists came to understand how the struggles for Black freedom and justice would be ongoing. This discussion will be chaired and moderated by Corey Brooks (York Coll. of Pennsylvania), and panelists include Frank Cirillo (Univ. of Michigan), Myisha Eatmon (Harvard Univ.), and Sarah Gronningsater (Univ. of Pennsylvania).

This online event is free and open to the public; registration is required. There is no in-person component for this event. A recording will be available at here in the weeks following the event.

Saturday, April 27, 2024

Weekend Roundup

  • Holly Brewer, University of Maryland, discusses the Trump immunity case on the Law Dork podcast Nancy Isenberg, Louisiana State University, does so as well, here.  And Donald Nieman, University of Binghamton does here.
  • Legal history was well represented when the Society for Historians of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era met for its annual luncheon at the annual meeting of the Organization of American Historians.  Laura Edwards, Princeton University, gave the Distinguished Historian Address, “No Account: Rethinking the Narrative of Women and Property in the Late Nineteenth Century.”  Michael Willrich, Brandeis University, won the President’s Book Prize for American Anarchy: The Epic Struggle between Immigrant Radicals and the U.S. Government at the Dawn of the Twentieth Century (Basic Books, 2023).  Elizabeth D. Katz, University of Florida, received Honorable Mention for the Fishel-Calhoun Prize, an article prize for new scholars, for “Sex, Suffrage, and State Constitutional Law: Women’s Legal Right to Hold Public Office,” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism (2022).  And Mazie Hough, University of Maine, won the 2024 JGAPE Best Article Prize for “‘There is Nothing So Sacred as Human Life:’ Infanticide and the State of Maine, 1877-1917.” (SHGAPE Blog).   
  • ICYMI: Throckmorton's Case continues to fascinate decades after we first encountered it in John Langbein's DLI  (The Leaflet).  Ronald G. Shafer on Justice Joseph P. Bradley and the Hayes-Tilden Commission (WaPo Retropolis). A notice of Michael Hoeflich’s Legal Feasts (KU News).

Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers.

Monday, February 26, 2024

Gage to Discuss Hoover at GW Law

GW Law announces a public event on a certain alumnus, J. Edgar Hoover (LL.B. 1916; LL.M. 1917).  Professor of Practice Jonathan Cedarbaum moderates a conversation with Beverly Gage, Yale University and winner of the Pulitzer Prize for Biography on Wednesday, February 28, 12:05-1:30, in its Burns Moot Courtroom.  Refreshments will be served.  RSVP to nsla@law.gwu.edu.

--Dan Ernst

Thursday, February 15, 2024

Prévost to Lecture on Renaissance Jurists

The Edinburgh Law School’s Centre for Legal History will host a talk with Xavier Prévost, Professor of Legal History at the University of Bordeaux, on 10 May. Professor Prévost will lecture on "The Encyclopedism of Renaissance Humanist Jurists."  Register here.

The expression “Legal humanism of the Renaissance” refers to the movement that emerged from the full integration of law into humanist knowledge, which began at the turn of the 15th and 16th centuries. Starting with a critique of medieval scholasticism for the study of legal texts, this intellectual movement proposed new methods for producing legal ideas based on an encyclopedic approach. Although there were many methodological differences between the legal scholars grouped under the banner of humanism, they shared the conception of a legal science that is not closed in on itself. Thus, they applied to law the humanist idea that knowledge forms a vast body made up of elements that may be intellectually differentiated, but which remain interrelated: the understanding of one of these elements must therefore logically call upon all those related to it. Not only did these scholars master the legal sources (Roman law, canon law, customs, royal legislation, court decisions, etc.), but they constantly referred to history and geography, philosophy and theology, philology and rhetoric, literature and poetry, mathematics and architecture, agronomy and astronomy.

The encyclopedism of Renaissance humanist jurists then caused an upheaval in the understanding of law, while participating massively in the production of knowledge beyond legal ideas. Presenting such an approach can contribute to the current debate which, faced with the extreme compartmentalisation of disciplines and even a growing separation between legal branches, is calling for greater use of interdisciplinarity.

--Dan Ernst.  (H/t: Scottish Legal News.)

Monday, January 22, 2024

Legal History at AALS

I'm afraid I didn't attend the Legal History sessions at the Annual Meeting of the Association of American Law Schools earlier this month, but here, from the program, are two sessions sponsored by the Legal History Section (in the latter case, jointly with other sections).

Legal History of Capitalism.  The legal history of capitalism has entered a new phase, following the rise of the new history of capitalism. Its focus on the evolution of the law creating, governing, and enabling the institutions of a market economy, indeed, including its very existence, has energized a new generation of legal historians. This session will attend to the work of young scholars, voices that have uncovered heretofore unseen aspects of the history of capitalism. Legal history is by its nature interdisciplinary, it discusses the sophisticated work of legal historians outside of the legal academy, the better to build intellectual and institutional bridges.

Session Speakers: Kevin R. Organization: Michigan State University College of Law; Gregory A. Mark, DePaul University College of Law (Moderator); Nadav Orian Peer, University of Colorado Law School; Sarah Winsberg, Brooklyn Law School.

The Uses and Misuses of History: The Roberts Court and Its Constitutional Revolution.  The Roberts Court has embarked on a constitutional revolution using history to legitimate its authority. Sometimes the Courts conservative majority employs originalism, sometimes it invokes tradition, and sometimes it ignores originalism and tradition altogether. Critics charge that many of the Court's decisions are undermining democracy and civil rights, while supporters argue that the Court is restoring the Framers' Constitution. This program will discuss how lawyers, scholars, and judges use and misuse history. Our starting points will be Jack Balkin’s Memory and Authority: The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation (2024) and Jonathan Gienapp’s Against Constitutional Originalism: A Historical Critique (2024).

 --Dan Ernst

Thursday, January 11, 2024

Sugarman on "The Hidden Histories of the Pinochet Case"

David Sugarman, Professor of Law Emeritus at the Law School of Lancaster University, is lecturing on The Hidden Histories of the Pinochet Case in the "Director's Seminar" at the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies.  The event will occur in the IALS Council Chamber, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, 17 Russell Square, London WC1B 5DR on February 6, 2024, 5:00PM - 6:30PM.  You may register here.

Autumn 2023 marked the 25th anniversary of Augusto Pinochet’s arrest in London, and the subsequent decisions of Britain’s top court denying Pinochet’s claim as a former head of state to immunity. It was the first time that a former head of state had, while travelling abroad, been arrested on charges of genocide and crimes against humanity, and where that former leader’s claims to immunity were rejected by a domestic court. Hugely controversial, Pinochet’s arrest and the “Pinochet precedent” changed the meaning of international justice, giving a massive fillip to human-rights movements, galvanising victims and their loved ones, activists and lawyers.   

This lecture brings into the open the hidden histories of the Pinochet case. It reveals what went on behind the scenes, in law and in politics. Drawing on a unique set of 250 interviews with victims, NGO’s, activists, judges, lawyers, politicians, government officials and journalists during or shortly after the case, and exhaustive archival research, it casts new light on:

• Pinochet’s arrest.
• The mobilisation of a human rights coalition determined to indict Pinochet.
• The turbulent legal proceedings in London, including the decision to rehear the case as Lord Hoffmann lacked the appearance of judicial independence.
• The vital roles played by victims, their representatives, the superjuez, lawyers, journalists and media outlets (notably, El País) in sustaining the case against Pinochet versus the powerful forces seeking to resist it.
• Pinochet’s release on health grounds.

Under huge pressure many people produced high quality work, but there were structural and personal shortcomings. The lecture lays bare the collaborations that arose, and the professional and personal fissures that ensued.

The struggle to bring Pinochet to justice in London and Madrid was a remarkable endeavour. It has special saliency in an era when autocracy, impunity and denialism of human rights crimes are on the rise, and the notion of international justice is being challenged.
The lecture is situated at the intersection of law, politics, activism, the humanities and the social sciences. It will appeal to the IALS community and beyond.

Speaker: David Sugarman is Professor of Law Emeritus at the Law School of Lancaster University; Senior Associate Research Fellow, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, University of London; Senior Associate, Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, University of Oxford. He has authored, co-authored and edited 24 books and special issues of journals, and has published over 100 articles and book chapters. He has written widely on the Pinochet case including in the Modern Law Review, Journal of Law and Society, Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies, Amicus Curiae, The Guardian, The Times, The Santiago Times, Open Democracy and El Mostrador. He has contributed to TV and radio on the subject, and has delivered keynote lectures on the case in Australia, Austria, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK and the USA.  

Chair: Professor Carl Stychin, IALS Director.

 --Dan Ernst

Saturday, December 9, 2023

Weekend Roundup

  • The Ius Commune Podcast has released on Spotify the first of a two-part series on French Medieval Law with Ada Kuskowski, University of Pennsylvania.
  • Congratulations to Tomiko Brown-Nagin upon her receipt of the 2023 the Order of the Coif award for Civil Rights Queen: Constance Baker Motley and the Struggle for Equality (Harvard Law Today).
  • Lee Wilson leads the new “legal history emphasis area” in the Department of History and Geography’s at Clemson University (Clemson News).
  • Here is the historians' amicus brief in the free speech case, Moody v. NetChoice, in the U.S. Supreme Court.
  • ICYMI: Saul Cornell on How the Supreme Court's Conservatives Can Solve Their Guns Dilemma Without Losing Face (Slate).  Unraveling Ulysses S. Grant’s Complex Relationship With Slavery (Smithsonian).  A six-episode, "true  crimes" podcast on the trial of Levi Weeks for the murder of Emma Sands in 1800.  (“I’m standing in this clothing store,” said the creator Allison Flom, and “see people around trying on sweaters and slacks, and mannequins everywhere, wanting to just scream, like, 'Someone was killed here!'”) (CBS News)

 Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers.

Friday, September 29, 2023

Masur and Penningroth on the Forgotten Years of the Civil Rights Movement

Online on at noon ET on Thursday, October 5, the National Constitution Center will host a session in its "America's Town hall" series, The Forgotten Years of the Civil Rights Movement:

Prize-winning historians Kate Masur, author of Until Justice Be Done: America’s First Civil Rights Movement, from the Revolution to Reconstruction, and Dylan Penningroth, author of the new book Before the Movement: The Hidden History of Black Civil Rights, explore the central role of African Americans in the struggle for justice and equality long before the social movement of the 1950s and 1960s. Jeffrey Rosen, president and CEO of the National Constitution Center, moderates.
--Dan Ernst