Showing posts with label Research tips. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Research tips. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 5, 2026

10 Things I learned while writing my (second) book

Reading room at the British Library
 I am delighted to be back as a Legal History (guest) Blogger. My second scholarly monograph, Fear of theFalse: Forensic Science and the Law of Crime in Colonial South Asia, came out in April 2026 with Cornell University Press. This month, I'd like to share some insights, surprises, and challenges from the project, which occupied me for much of the past 12+ years. Today: 10 things I learned while working on the book:

1.      You can take publication-grade photos with your phone: Perhaps this is obvious to others, but I
assumed the only way I could get publication-quality versions of images for my book that I took at the British Library (pictured) would be to order images through the BL’s Imaging Services. Unfortunately, the BL was hit with a ransomware attack in 2023. BL leadership refused to pay the ransom, and their online catalogue was destroyed as promised. It took the BL several years to recover (they are still not back to how things were before), and their Imaging services were essentially shut down so they could concentrate all their efforts on reconstructing the catalogue. For about a year, I thought this meant I could not include about a third the images I planned to use for my book, which was devastating. But then my IT colleague showed me how to use my phone to re-take the images at the BL (I could still go there and order up the original items, fortunately). By putting the phone on a stack of books to avoid any tilt or handshaking, and by adding 1-2 light sources, I retook these images and they were good enough to publish. The BL gave me permission to reproduce these for free, happily.

More after the jump.

Friday, July 17, 2026

Clifford et al. on OCR Error Rates

Jim Clifford, Jacob Polay, and Jessica Jack, University of Saskatchewan, and Mark Humphries and Lianne C. Leddy, Wilfrid Laurier University, have posted Reading the Archive by Machine: An OCR Benchmark for Historians, 1612–1921, in Working Papers in Critical Search

A benchmark of six OCR systems (Tesseract, olmOCR 2, Chandra 2, Infinity Parser 2, GLM-OCR, and Gemini 3.5 Flash) on human-transcribed archival documents spanning 1612–1921: early-modern print, nineteenth-century newspapers, full multi-column pages, and handwriting. The free, open models a historian can run on their own hardware have caught up with the paid commercial service on printed sources — level on clean newspaper print, ahead on complex multi-column pages — leaving the commercial model a real lead only on difficult handwriting. Because accuracy has converged, the choice between tools is now practical rather than qualitative: it turns on layout fidelity and on speed and cost. We report per-content-type results, characterise each tool’s failure profile (olmOCR silently modernizes archaic spelling and collapses on multi-column pages; Gemini refuses some pages outright), and argue for a tiered workflow that transcribes a collection with a fast open tool and spends the paid model only on the pages that reward it. Every number is produced by the harness in the paper’s repository, and the expandable transcription panels are generated from the same result files, so the prose and the evidence cannot drift apart. This is Version 1.0 of a paper we intend to keep current as new models are released.
--Dan Ernst

Monday, June 29, 2026

Oxford Bibliographies in Legal History

[We have the following announcement of a new series, Oxford Bibliographies in Legal History, edited by Gautham Rao, the former Editor-in-Chief of Law and History Review.  DRE]

Once the purview of lawyers and exclusively focused on courts and legal doctrine, legal history has become a vibrant, dynamic field that encompasses power relations, institutions, governance and the state, individual and family social relations, identities and ideology, and the lived experience of social, religious, and cultural minorities. The field is deeply interdisciplinary, featuring independent scholars, public historians, and academics in law schools, as well as departments of history, anthropology, sociology, area studies, and language and literature. It is also global in scope, with scholars studying imperial and national histories as well as broad geographic regions and comparative legal history as well. Oxford Bibliographies in Legal History aims to provide scholars with the central themes, methods, and literature—recent and classic alike—that have established legal history as a growing and increasingly diverse discipline.

Oxford Bibliographies in Legal History provides authoritative guides to the key scholarship in the field of legal history. Curated by area editors and written by experts in the field, each bibliography provides a guided selection of scholarship within legal history, along with original annotations and informative paragraphs that provide much-needed context to each citation. The bibliographies each contain a table of contents and headings, a general introduction, a commentary paragraph for each thematic subheading, bibliographic citations, and annotations. The articles are starting points for research, offering recommendations for the best texts to go to for an introduction to a topic, and providing a critical selection of the most important sources and resources. Themes covered in the collection include colonialism, gender, sexuality, conflict and war, Indigenous studies, crime and carceral institutions, and more.

Saturday, March 21, 2026

Weekend Roundup

  • The Asian Legal History Association has hosted its official launch in Hong Kong (The Standard).  The speech of the Secretary for Justice, Paul Lam, at the launch is hereUpdate: Donal Coffey was there, too.
  • Over at JOTWELL: Blake Emerson (UCLA Law) has posted an admiring review of Nathaniel Donahue's "Officers at Common Law," which is forthcoming in the Yale Law Journal.   
  • Ashley Everson on Pauli Murray, the Brown Decision, and the Struggle for Equal Rights (Black Perspectives).
  • A notice of Akhil Reed Amar's Giannella lecture at Villanova on Born Equal: Remaking America’s Constitution, 1840–1920 (Villanovan). 
  • Five Takeaways from conference on Richard Primus’s The Oldest Constitutional Question  (Michigan Law). 
  • ICYMI: Birthright Citizenship Edition.  Dahlia Lithwick spoke to Anna O. Law about Law's book, Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship (Amicus). Ilya Somin on Slavery and Birthright Citizenship (Lawfare).  Smita Ghosh on Lynch v. Clarke (1844), the birthright citizenship case you never heard of (Slate). Akhil and Vikram Amar and Jason Mazzone on why the text, history, and structure of a landmark 1952 statute doom Trump’s executive order (SCOTUSblog). 
  • ICYMI: Orin S. Kerr on How AI Tools Can Help With Legal History Research (Volokh Conspiracy). "The Trump administration’s campaign to remove National Park Service exhibits that 'inappropriately disparage' historical figures" has bogged down (Politico).

Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers. 

Monday, February 16, 2026

Penningroth in Conversation at the University of Nebraska

[We have the following announcement from our friends at the U.S. Law and Race Initiative of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.  DRE.]

Join us this Friday, Feb 20 from 1:30-2:30pm (cst) for an in-depth conversation between Dylan Penningroth and Will Thomas on the power of family and local archives in telling Black legal histories. Register now to join the discussion via zoom.

Monday, July 7, 2025

Mass SCJ Records Transcribed

The Ames Foundation, with the financial support of the Colonial Society of Massachusetts, has been transcribing the twenty-two volumes of the records of the Massachusetts Superior Court of Judicature ca. 1690 – ca. 1780 (Mass SCJ), edited by Professor Sally Hadden of Western Michigan University.   The transcriptions of the first two volumes have just been published online.  The first transcribe the records of the Mass SCJ from 1760–1762; the second transcribes a volume of maritime cases dating from the period of the Revolutionary War.

--Dan Ernst 

Saturday, June 28, 2025

Weekend Roundup

  • Like us, you might have heard something about limited access to the collections at the National Archives, College ParkHere is the latest that we've found, courtesy of the American Historical Association.  
  • We were very pleased to learn that the Law, Culture and the Humanities has given its James Boyd White Award to Robert W. Gordon.  H/t: SB
  • "John A. Kirk, George W. Donaghey Distinguished Professor of History at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock, has been awarded the Susie Pryor Award for his article examining the case of Mary Dinwiddie, the only African American woman sentenced to death in Arkansas during the 20th century."  More.  
  • A colloquy with Jill Hasday, University of Minnesota Law School, on her book, We the Men: How Forgetting Women’s Struggles for Equality Perpetuates Inequality (Minnesota Law).
  • "Kim Lane Scheppele will give Chautauqua Institution’s 21st annual Robert H. Jackson Lecture on the Supreme Court of the United States, on Monday, August 11, 2025, at 3:30 p.m." (Jackson List.) 
  • "Etta Haynie Maddox: First Woman Licensed to Practice Law in Maryland" (In Custodia Legis). 
  • "Why America Got a Warfare State, Not a Welfare State": Sam Moyn reviews Andrew Preston’s Total Defense: The New Deal and the Invention of National Security (New Republic).   
  • The eighth biennial conference of the European Society for Comparative Legal History begins next week at the University of Szeged (ESCLH).
  • Lawbook Exchange's June 2025 catalogue of Scholarly Law & Legal History: Part 1 and Part 2.

Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers.  

Saturday, June 21, 2025

Weekend Roundup

  • The Minnesota Supreme Court Historical Society is hosting a one-hour CLE panel, A Dive Into Unitary Executive Theory: Presidential Powers and Limitations, on June 24 from 3-4 CDT in person at the Minnesota Judicial Center.  The panelists are Christine Chabot, Marquette University Law School; Heidi Kitrosser, Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law; and Nick Bednar, University of Minnesota Law School
  • UC Irvine School of Humanities on its alumna, Stanford Law's Bernadette Meyler 
  • Modern Criminal Law Review had a symposium on Chloë Kennedy’s Inducing Intimacy: Deception, Consent and the Law (Cambridge University Press, 2024).  A podcast version is here.
  • ICYMI:  How Much Money Do Historians Make From Their Writing? (Contingent Magazine).  Kate Hampton on a Montana antidiscrimination case from 1881 (Daily Montana).  Manisha Sinha on Lincoln and the abolitionists (Unpopulist). John Yoo on Putting the Executive in "Unitary Executive" (Law & Liberty).  St. Louis's Old Courthouse (Ladue News).

 Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers. 

Wednesday, May 21, 2025

Justice Browning Awarded Texas Legal History Fellowship

[Congratulations to Justice Browning on this fellowship!  DRE]

The Texas State Historical Association has selected Justice (ret.) John G. Browning (law professor and Distinguished Jurist in Residence at Faulkner Law School in Montgomery, Alabama) as the winner of the 2025 Larry McNeill Research Fellowship in Texas Legal History. This award, which includes a stipend, is presented annually " for the best research proposal on some aspect of Texas legal history." Established in 2019 in honor of Larry McNeill ( a past president of both the Texas State Historical Association and the Texas Supreme Court Historical Society), it " recognizes his commitment to fostering academic and grassroots research in legal history."  Justice Browning's winning proposal was for " Forgotten Firsts: Uncovering the Lives and Legacies of Texas' Early Black Lawyers." Justice Browning's work on America's early Black lawyers has appeared in multiple law reviews, bar journals, and the Journal of Supreme Court History.  The award and check were presented at a luncheon on February 28, 2025, during the TSHA's Annual Meeting in Houston.

Friday, February 14, 2025

SCHS's Henry J. Abraham Early Career Research Grant

 [We have the following announcement.  H/t: H-Law.  DRE]

The Supreme Court Historical Society invites applicants for the Henry J. Abraham Early Career Research Grant for research on the history of the United States Supreme Court. The award is named for the distinguished University of Virginia scholar whose numerous works on constitutional law and the judicial process have had an enduring impact on the field of Supreme Court history.

Awarded on a competitive basis in June of each year, the $1,000 grant supports the research of those who are pursuing academic careers in legal history, including graduate students, law students, and those who are no more than five years from completion of either the Ph.D. or J.D. The award will be given on the basis of the applicant’s potential for producing publishable work in the field of Supreme Court history, and the grant recipient will be expected to produce an article for submission to the Journal of Supreme Court History.

A completed application consists of a c.v., the name and contact information of a faculty reference, and a 750-1,000-word proposal, which should include a general description of the project and a plan for research.

Applicants should submit all materials to Clare Cushman, Executive Editor of the Journal of Supreme Court History, by May 1, 2025. The award winner will be notified by June 3, 2025.

Saturday, June 29, 2024

Weekend Roundup

  • In the Talking about Methods podcast series over at Frontiers of Socio-Legal Studies, Linda Mulcahy talks to Michael Lobban, All Souls College, Oxford, about working with archives as a legal historian.
  • The commentaries continue on the U.S. Supreme Court's use of history (and various reflections on the use of history in judicial decisionmaking) in the recently decided Second Amendment case United States v. Rahimi: Eric Segall at Dorf on Law; Mark Tushnet at Balkinization; Jennifer Tucker at CNN; Saul Cornell at Slate.
  • "Australia’s first civilian jury was entirely female. Here’s how ‘juries of matrons’ shaped our legal history," by Alice Neikirk, University of Newcastle (The Conversation).
  • Balkinization is hosting a symposium on Mark A. Graber's Punish Treason, Reward Loyalty: The Forgotten Goals of Constitutional Reform after the Civil War (University of Kansas Press, 2023).  The first posts are by Anne Twitty, David S. Schwartz, and Evan D. Bernick.
  • Queens University has noted the prizes won by two of its doctoral candidates.  Michael Borsk received two awards for his article, “Conveyance to Kin: Property, Preemption, and Indigenous Nations in North America, 1763-1822,” William and Mary Quarterly 80, no. 1 (January 2023): 87-124.  They are the Peter Oliver Prize in Canadian Legal History from the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History, awarded to the best published work by a student, and the 2024 Jean-Marie Fecteau Prize by the Canadian Historical Association, awarded to the best article published in a peer-reviewed journal.  Margaret Ross won the best article prize awarded by the Canadian Committee on the History of Sexuality for her article, “‘Your Town Is Rotten’: Prostitution, Profit, and the Governing of Vice in Kingston, Ontario, 1860s–1920s,” Journal of the History of Sexuality 32 (May 2023).
  • ICYMI:  Washington [State's] legal history, including West Coast Hotel v. Parrish, captured in murals for a Wenatchee courtroom (NCWLIFE). John A. Lupton on John Doe and Richard RoeMark Tushnet thinks some more about originalism (after stopping trying to make sense of originalism) (X).  Blake Emerson puts Jarkesy in historical context (Marketplace).
Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers.

Saturday, June 1, 2024

Weekend Roundup


  • Thomas G. Corcoran, 1935 (LC)
    A side note to the forgoing: At the start of his post, Dr. Reft reproduces a letter from Edward Holmes, the justice's nephew and executor, to Tom Corcoran, the justice's favorite legal secretary, in which the executor refers to "a question that intervenes between us."  Perhaps the question was the disposition of the Black Book.  In his often reliable memoir, Corcoran claimed that on the night the justice died, Edward Holmes said that the Black Book was "too personal" and should be destroyed, but that when the nephew's back was turned he "slipped it behind some other volumes on a shelf.  A little later I smuggled it out of the house under my shirt and sent it by courier the next day to the Harvard Law School."  Thomas G. Corcoran with Philip Kopper, “Rendezvous with Democracy: The Memoirs of ‘Tommy the Cork,’” Holmes, pp. 39-40, box 586, Corcoran MSS, Library of Congress.  I've never looked for corroborating evidence in the Edward J. Holmes Collection or other HLS records.  DRE.

  • The Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library at Yale University has issued a call for applications for its Fellowship Program. The library "welcome[s] applications from scholars and graduate students locally and globally who utilize traditional methods of archival and bibliographic research as well as from individuals who wish to pursue creative, interdisciplinary, and non-traditional approaches to conducting research in the collections." 
  • The New-York Historical Society has announced substantial postdoctoral and predoctoral fellowships in Women's History.  Due date: June 30
  • New on the Digging a Hole podcast: David C. Schleicher and Samuel Moyn interview Dylan C. Penningroth on his book Before the Movement: The Hidden History of Black Civil Rights.  And congratulations to Professor Penningroth for winning the J. Willard Hurst Book Prize of the Law and Society Association for Before the MovementBerkeley Law's notice of the awards the book has garnered is here.
  • On the New Books in Intellectual History podcast,  Kunal M. Parker discusses The Turn to Process: American Legal, Political, and Economic Thought, 1870-1970.
  • On the New Books in African American Studies podcast, Robert K. D. Colby discusses An Unholy Traffic: Slave Trading in the Civil War South.
  • ICYMI: Robert W. Gordon, Stanford Law, on the Trump Conviction and the History of Presidential Crimes (SLS Blogs).  The 1924 Indian Citizenship Act (Smithsonian; History Today).  Policy approaches to addressing a history of racial discrimination (Stanford IEPR).  Delaware marks 70th anniversary of its role in landmark Brown v. Board decision (WHYY).
 Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers.

Tuesday, December 26, 2023

Transportation Library Travel Grant

[We have the following announcement.  DRE.]

We are pleased to share that applications are open for the 2024-2025 Transportation Library Travel Grant.

The Northwestern University Transportation Library holds one of the largest transportation research collections in the world, covering all modes of transportation including aviation, rail, highway, public transit, and pedestrian and bicycle transportation. In addition to our technical collections that support research on current transportation issues, the library maintains special and archival collections such as timetables, passenger ephemera, and rare books and journals. It also holds a substantial collection of mid-19th to early 21st century transportation annual reports, and one of the most complete U.S. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) collections in existence.

This research grant was established in 2021 to facilitate and support research projects that significantly benefit from substantial onsite use of the Transportation Library’s unique technical, special, and archival collections.

Funding.
  Each year we will award one or more grants, up to a total of $3,000.  Grants will be awarded to reimburse expenses for transportation, accommodations, and meals for one or more on-site visits to Northwestern University Libraries.

Eligibility.  Open to academic and independent researchers. We encourage applications by those working in traditional academic practice as well as those whose research is interdisciplinary, or oriented towards creative arts and practices.  There are no restrictions as to the applicant’s nationality or academic status.    Research may be in any field supported by the collections of the Transportation Library. At the discretion of the selection committee and Northwestern University Libraries, the grant may be awarded to an individual applicant, a team, or divided among multiple applicants and/or teams. Further, if a suitable recipient is not identified among the applications received, we reserve the right to withhold the grant for that particular year.  Applicants who are not awarded the grant in a specific year may resubmit proposals in following years without prejudice.  An applicant may receive only one award for any one project as determined by the selection committee and Northwestern Libraries. Researchers affiliated with Northwestern University will not be considered for this travel grant.

How to apply.  To apply, please submit the following:

  • A project proposal (1,200 words max) that describes the proposed research; explains the significance of the collection materials to the project; [and] proposes specific outcomes (e.g., dissertation, article, book, creative or artistic work) that will result from this research
  • A curriculum vitae
  • A detailed budget indicating the total amount requested with itemized list of projected expenses for transportation, accommodations and meals. For meals and incidentals, applicants should use the U.S. General Services Administration Per Diem Rates for Meals & Incidentals (M&IE) for Chicago. Applicants should indicate any other sources of funding that will be applied to the project, if applicable. For additional information on planning a budget, see allowable expenses and Out-of-Town Visitor Resources.

Applicants should arrange for one (1) letter of recommendation from someone qualified to judge the quality, feasibility, and significance of the proposal and the qualifications of the applicant to successfully complete the project to be sent in support of their proposed project. Those writing recommendations should submit their letters directly to librarygrants@northwestern.edu.

Applicants should submit the research description, curriculum vitae, and budget by e-mail attachment (PDF format) to librarygrants@northwestern.edu.

Please note: The selection committee is unable to provide feedback with regard to unsuccessful applications.

Expectations
.  All grant awardees will be required to submit receipts for expenses incurred and will be reimbursed, in accordance with Northwestern University policies. For meals and incidentals, we require that recipients use the U.S. General Services Administration Per Diem Rates for Meals &Incidentals (M&IE) instead of itemized receipts. Reimbursement requests must be made within 30 days of last day of visit.

Grant awardees must conduct their research visit within the academic year following the grant being awarded (between September 1st and August 1st).

Upon completion of the research, grant awardees will be required to submit a brief report [1-2 pages] summarizing the use of the collection(s) and how the visit benefited their research to librarygrants@northwestern.edu.

Questions?  Contact librarygrants@northwestern.edu.

Monday, July 25, 2022

Reading Poetry, Writing Legal History

     Writing is always a fraught process. It can be especially so during a pandemic. In 2020 and early 2021, when I was completing revisions to my book, I found I needed something to bring structure to my days and weeks. But I also needed liberation from the four walls of my house and the seemingly endless rinse-and-repeat cycle of pandemic life. I needed fresh perspective on material I'd been working on for years; I needed to be inspired.

    I started to begin each day by reading poetry. Theodore Roethke reminded me to pay attention to the living things outside my window, and thereby rooted me in time and in the seasons. Thus I noticed when I heard the first mourning dove of the year (in 2021, March 3rd; this year, March 10th). As Adrienne Rich writes in "A Walk by the Charles," "What lends us anchor but the mutable?" Her words were often on my mind as I worked to draw out the larger themes of my argument, without losing sight of the details specific to eighteenth-century Massachusetts.

    Some verse was a little too evocative of the here and now. Although originally written about a different time and place, Kipling's lines about "the men who edged their agonies and chid them in their pain" and "the idle-minded overlings who quibbled while they died" were a little too on the nose in early 2020 ("Mesopotamia 1917"). This kind of orientation to daily life did not encourage constructive reflection.

    Others, though, invited me to slow down, pay attention, and absorb their offerings. Poets such as e.e. cummings and W.S. Graham and Derek Walcott demanded attention to their neologisms: "mud-luscious," "puddle-wonderful," and "outfloats"; "saltcut," "strewn-silver," and "sparse-powdered." Walcott justly asserted that "when I write/this poem, each phrase go be soaked in salt." When powering through thousands of prosecutions, sometimes it's easy to skim for keywords and dismiss entire phrases as mere legal boilerplate. The practice of reading poetry helped me return to the sources with my ears newly primed for those phrases soaked in salt.

    And what of writing? Did the poetry inspire better prose? My colleague Bob Vivian, a poet and writer, thinks it can; he has described reading poetry before writing "like taking a flame from another person and coaxing into one's own." Bob's beautiful metaphor obscures the fact that igniting the first person's flame might have required several frustrating hours of rubbing sticks together.  But over the long pandemic winter, I took heart from cummings, who assures us, "--whose hearts are mountains, roots are trees,/it's they shall cry hello to the spring." And, also, from Scottish poet Edwin Morgan's rollicking tribute to "Sir James Murray" (creator of the Oxford English Dictionary), so stuffed with Scots words you'd swear it was a Robbie Burns poem, a reminder that language is supposed to be fun: "To work, to work! To words!"

--Kristin A. Olbertson

Tuesday, July 12, 2022

The Work-Life Balance & Other Myths

         It took far longer to get my first book to publication than I ever thought it would. It began as my dissertation, completed in 2005. The next year I began a tenure-track position at a small liberal arts college with a 3:3 teaching load and fairly heavy service and advising expectations. The year after that, my oldest child was diagnosed with both a disability and a chronic illness.

    His conditions entailed regular visits to medical specialists and therapists, some up to two hundred miles away; when at home, he required direct supervision at all times. When time allowed, I worked on the major revisions the manuscript required. Extended or multiple visits to archives were simply not a possibility, as he needed specialized care and could not be left. I would have to make the most of the material I had (and fortunately, I had quite a bit). I lost one entire summer to recovery from emergency surgery.

    Finally, after six years, I had a fully revised draft ready to submit to a press who had expressed interest. They sent it to readers, who returned thorough reviews which, while supportive, recommended substantive revisions. These were entirely fair, and I probably could have completed them in a year, under normal circumstances. However, my son's illness had just progressed from chronic to acute, and I decided I needed to focus all my energies on helping him.

    That situation was so overwhelming for the next few years that I had no thoughts or energy to spare for the manuscript. I didn't even look at it, in fact. But as my son slowly started to recover, I began to think about giving it another try. I got back in touch with the press, and we agreed that it probably wouldn't work to proceed with them anymore. Nonetheless, I tackled revisions in a serious way and began thinking about where else a good fit for the manuscript might be. And thanks to an editor, readers, indexer, copyeditor, and countless others willing to work through the exigencies of pandemic publishing, the book is now in print. More importantly, my son is doing well.

    I share my story not for sympathy or because I think it's unique--but because I recognize that these sorts of experiences are becoming all too common in the age of Covid and Long Covid. So many academics, especially caregivers, are seeing their work goals recede into the distance as they try to be the safety net that our society and institutions fails to provide.

    Many, particularly contingent and untenured faculty, are feeling anxious about how their caregiving responsibilities have affected, and continue to affect, their scholarly productivity. And they don't feel they can acknowledge their situation--I certainly have not, before now. I would like to normalize talking about some of the challenges we are facing. I'd also like to encourage those of us with tenure to be more creative in thinking about how to extend greater flexibility and support to our colleagues.

N.B.: I've attached labels to this post such as "Publishing advice" and "Research tips," which are quite misleading. Nothing here should be construed as advice or tips, as I do not recommend this path if you can at all avoid it. But I did want to assure anyone else who might be sharing a common experience that you are not alone.

--Kristin A. Olbertson

Tuesday, July 13, 2021

Federal Judges' Papers at the Library of Congress

Prettyman Courthouse (Highsmith)

Over at In Custodia Legis, Ryan Reft, a historian of the modern United States focusing on domestic policy and law in the Manuscript Division at the Library of Congress, has a post on his and Senior Archives Specialist Connie L. Cartledge's new and invaluable guide to the Division’s collections of the papers of judges who served on Article III courts below the Supreme Court of the United States.  The holdings on the appellate judges of the DC Circuit are particularly strong, including the papers of Robert Bork, Henry Edgerton, Harry Edwards, Charles Fahy, RBG, Harold Leventhal, Carl McGowan, E. Barrett Prettyman, Wiley Rutledge, Harold M. Stephens, David Tatel, Skelly Wright, each of whose careers the guide nicely synopsizes.  As the guide notes, the papers are valuable for topics far beyond the strictly judicial or legal.

--Dan Ernst

Thursday, February 25, 2021

CSCHS Research Travel Grant in California Legal History

[We have the following announcement.  DRE]

The CSCHS Research Travel Grant in California Legal History
.  The California Supreme Court Historical Society has established a Research Travel Grant to defray the expenses of graduate students and law students at accredited U.S. universities and law schools who are researching California legal history for the purpose of preparing an article or other paper.

This grant was funded by the generosity of California Supreme Court Justice Kathryn Mickle Werdegar (Ret.) and David M. Werdegar, M.D., in honor of Selma Moidel Smith, Editor-in-Chief of California Legal History. Additional donations are welcome to ensure the continuation of this grant program.

Wednesday, November 25, 2020

Grisinger Reviews Works on Vertical Files and Paper Shredders

You have to be a certain kind of legal historian to have your imagination fired by tabbed file folders, but, hell, I’m one too.  Over at Jotwell, Joanna Grisinger, Northwestern University, writes on two articles, Craig Robertson, Granular Certainty, The Vertical Filing Cabinet, and the Transformation of Files, 4 Administory 76 (2019); and Marianne Constable, The Paper Shredder: Trails of Law, 23 Law Text Culture 276 (2019).  Professor Grisinger writes:

"The Last of the NRA" (1938)(LC)
Anyone who has done archival research has grappled with someone else’s file organization—are the papers you seek filed chronologically? By correspondent? By topic? By some other method inscrutable to the outsider? Does the filing system reflect the thinking of your research subject, of a secretary or clerk, or of a later archivist seeking to impose order on chaos? Finally, will the files actually contain the documents you’re hoping to find? Two recent articles take seriously the prosaic technologies of file storage, on the one hand, and file destruction, on the other, explicating the history of the tabbed file folder, the filing cabinet, and the paper shredder. These technologies are crucial to the contemporaneous operation of the bureaucratic process, and, of course, silently shape how we write history from those files. [More. ]
–Dan Ernst

Saturday, July 4, 2020

Weekend Roundup

  • Not only has Elizabeth Papp Kamali, “a scholar specializing in medieval legal history,” been tenured and promoted to professor of law at Harvard Law School, she’s been deputy deaned! (Harvard Law Today).
  • "Erasing History or Making History? Race, Racism, and the American Memorial Landscape," an American Historical Association Webinar, with David W. Blight and Annette Gordon-Reed, moderated by AHA Executive Director Jim Grossman.  (Facebook)
  • ICYMI: Aderson Bellegarde François (Georgetown Law), on Robert Smalls and Woodrow Wilson (New Republic).  The renaming of US Coast Guard Cutter Taney (Fox Baltimore).  A nicely illustrated history of the ballot (Quartz).  Jack Rakove (Stanford University) on what TJ meant by "all men are created equal" (Stanford News)
Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers.

Saturday, June 6, 2020

Weekend Roundup

  • Reminder: Applications for the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation awards to support research and writing in American legal history by early-career scholar are due on July 1.  (The Committee for Research Fellowships and Awards of the American Society for Legal History reviews the applications and makes recommendations to the Foundation.)  More.
  • This year’s recipients of Charlotte W. Newcombe Doctoral Dissertation Fellowships include Tamar Menashe, Columbia University, for "People of the Law: The Imperial Supreme Court and Jews in Cross-Confessional Legal Cultures in Germany, 1495–1690," and Lila Teeters, University of New Hampshire, for “Native Citizens: The Fight For and Against Native Citizenship in the United States, 1866–1924.”
  • Process, the blog of the Journal of American History and the Organization of American Historians, has put out a call for submissions on "all aspects of the history of disability in the United States."
  • Here is the Harvard Law School faculty's open letter condemning "a series of acts by President Trump and other public servants that endorse violence and are inconsistent with a democratic legal order." Signatories include every legal historian we can think of who teaches there.
  • The Consortium for Undergraduate Law & Justice Programs recently announced its 2020 awards for teaching and best undergraduate paper.
  • ICYMI: Dean Risa Goluboff draws on her own historical research in her message to UVA law students.  David Blight on Frederick Douglass and "the tortured relationship between protest and change" (The Atlantic). Alexander Zhang on this history of "school-to-prison pipeline" policing in Minneapolis (Slate).
  • ICYMI, Insurrection Act EditionGautham Rao on the Posse Comitatus and Insurrection Acts (CNN).  The History Channel on the Jeffersonian origins of the Insurrection Act.  Still more, in WaPo's Retropolis.
  • Over at Balkinization, Stephen Griffin develops an aspect of his recent SSRN post "Optimistic Originalism and the Reconstruction Amendments."Also at Balkinization: Gregory Ablavsky (Stanford Law School) on "PROMESA and Original Understandings of the Territories’ Constitutional Status."
Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers.