The audiences of early modern English drama were multiple, and they intersected with the legal system in various ways, whether through the cross-pollination of the theaters and the Inns of Court, the representations of the sovereign's justice performed before him, or the shared evidentiary orientations of jurors and spectators. As this piece written for a symposium on "Reasoning from Literature" contends, Shakespeare's Measure for Measure addressed to these various audiences the question of whether the King should judge in person. In doing so, it drew on extant political theories suggesting that the King refrain from exposing himself to public censure by condemning criminals and also augured Sir Edward Coke's subsequent resistance on the basis of the common law to King James I's assertion of a right to sit in judgment. Rather than choosing between these positions, the play points out the deficiencies inherent in each and leaves its audiences - including both King James I himself and his subjects - to reason from the examples it provides.Image.
Thursday, May 13, 2010
Meyler on 'Our Cities Institutions' and the Institution of the Common Law
'Our Cities Institutions' and the Institution of the Common Law has just been posted by Bernadette A. Meyler, Cornell University School of Law, and Princeton University Program in Law and Public Affairs. It is forthcoming in Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities. Here’s the abstract: