This essay addresses the relationship between the Constitution and Bill of Rights and the concept of economic liberty. It calls into question the famous quip of Justice Holmes in Lochner v. New York (1905) that the Constitution was not intended “to embody a particular economic theory.” The essay contends that the framers of the Constitution clearly envisioned a constitutional order grounded on private property and a market economy. To this end, many provisions of the Constitution pertain to property interests and economic activity. It concludes that, although the Constitution does not endorse a laissez-faire regime, Holmes was wrong to suggest that the Constitution was entirely neutral with respect to economic policy. In fact, the framers favored a free market and sought to protect property and contractual rights.
Thursday, April 28, 2011
Ely on The Constitution and Economic Liberty
Posted by Mary L. Dudziak
The Constitution and Economic Liberty has just been posted by James W. Ely Jr., Vanderbilt Law School. It is forthcoming in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy. Here's the abstract: