This is a substantial review of James Whitman's book on "The Origins of Reasonable Doubt: Theological Roots of the Criminal Trial" (Yale University Press 2008). The review proceeds in three main parts. Part I outlines the book's argument. Part II highlights four significant aspects of the book meriting high accolades. Part III raises four questions prompted by the book's thesis. The review concludes that "The argument challenges the conventional wisdom and prompts fresh thinking about seemingly well-understood institutions and doctrines. The thesis is not bulletproof and leaves some questions insufficiently answered. But the questions do not undermine the significance of the accomplishment. This is a groundbreaking book that deserves a broad readership."
Friday, October 2, 2009
Gallanis reviews Whitman, The Origins of Reasonable Doubt
Posted by Mary L. Dudziak
James Whitman, The Origins of Reasonable Doubt: Theological Roots of the Criminal Trial (2008) is taken up in a review essay, Reasonable Doubt and the History of the Criminal Trial, by Thomas P. Gallanis, University of Iowa. It appears in the University of Chicago Law Review (2009). Here's the abstract: